Milwaukee County Proposes A New Protected Class in Housing - "Receipt of Rental or Housing Assistance"

Milwaukee County Supervisor Maria Dimitrijevec is sponsoring a resolution to amend the Milwaukee County Code of General Ordinances related to Fair Housing to include a new protected class - the "receipt of rental or housing assistance." The resolution has been referred to the Economic Development Committee and may be scheduled to be discussed at the committee's meeting on March 12, 2018 at 9 AM.

If passed, this resolution would have a significant impact on landlords and property managers. Currently a landlord may legally refuse to accept any applicant if they receive rental or housing assistance. If this resolution passes, landlords in Milwaukee County would no longer be able to do so without risking a discrimination claim.

Under the proposed resolution, "receipt of rental or housing assistance" is defined as including the receipt of any form of financial contribution from a third party for the purposes of creating or keeping affordable housing for tenants, purchasers, or other potential housing recipients, including but not limited to, assistance provided pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, section 1437f (commonly known as the "Section 8" housing program), the HOME Partnership Program, the Community Development Block Grant program, or any other public or private rental assistance vouchers or programs.

Rental or housing assistance in SE Wisconsin is often referred to as "Section 8" or "Rent Assistance" or "RA." The most common form of rental assistance is run through the Section 8 program. Section 8 tenant-based housing assistance is available to low-income families and the subsidy moves with the tenant and can be used to pay toward rent at any conventional market-rate rental units. Essentially the tenant chooses the rental unit where they want to live and if the tenant meets the landlord's screening criteria, the landlord accepts the RA (which will be required in Milwaukee County if this resolution passes), and the rental unit passes an inspection, then the Section 8 program will pay the RA directly to the landlord. The RA typically does not cover the entire monthly rent amount and therefore the tenant will be required to pay the difference to the landlord.

In order for a tenant to receive RA they need to find a landlord that will accept it. In order for a landlord to receive RA on behalf of a tenant the landlord must enter into a contract with the government or its agent. Here is an example of such a contract.

Some things to be aware of when entering into a contract to receive RA include:

1. The government or its agent determines what the maximum amount of rent that can be charged by the landlord for the rental property based on a number of factors. Once that maximum amount is determined, a landlord is prohibited from charging the tenant a higher amount.

2. The government or its agent will inspect the rental unit and it must pass certain housing quality standards and be maintained up to those standards throughout the lease term. If repairs are required to pass the inspection the landlord must pay for them and the landlord may also be cited for building code violations. At a minimum there will be annual inspections. If the standards are not met the government may withhold paying the RA to the landlord.

3. A landlord would not be able to use a month-to-month rental agreement with the tenant as all of the agencies that administer RA require the landlord to enter into an initial 12 month lease.

4. The government does not "screen" the tenant for the landlord - screening remains the landlord's responsibility.

5. The tenant cannot be evicted if the government fails to pay its portion of the monthly rent.

6. The landlord must serve the government with copies of any notice for failure to pay rent or other breach that the landlord serves on the tenant. If this is not done, it can serve as a basis for any ensuing eviction to be dismissed.

7. The government has no liability or responsibility to the landlord for the tenant's behavior (again, the government is not screening the tenant for you).

8. A landlord's lease must be approved by the government. A landlord's lease will be required to include the government's tenancy addendum and ideally the lease term (between the landlord's lease and the government's addendum) will be identical (but if it is not, the government's lease addendum controls).

Accepting RA is not for every landlord. For every landlord that loves the program I have heard just as many landlords that dislike it. Regardless of your view, you must be prepared to give up some control to the government in exchange for receiving the guaranteed RA from the government. There has been a trend around the country of municipalities adding "rental assistance" to the list of protected classes, so I am not surprised to see Milwaukee County joining in.

Milwaukee County Issues New Local Rule Regarding Stipulated Dismissals In Eviction Lawsuits

On May 1, 2015, the Chief Judge of Milwaukee County, Judge Jeffrey Kremers, issued new local rule 3.85 concerning Stipulations to Dismiss the first cause of action (possession of the property) in eviction cases.

Readers should review local rule 3.85 itself but I have summarized the pertinent points below.

1. A landlord and tenant may agree to dismiss the first cause of action (return of premises) in exchange for the tenant's promise to pay certain amounts to the landlord. Local Rule 3.85 governs when such agreements will be accepted and enforced by the Court.

2. All stipulations must be in writing.

3. The stipulation must state a date certain on which the final payment will be due.

4. The payment period should not be any longer than reasonably necessary for the tenant to pay the full amount owed to landlord. Once the final payment is made the landlord no longer has the right to seek an eviction of the tenant without filing a new eviction lawsuit.

5. If the stipulation requires payment from the tenant for any monies other than rent or court costs, the stipulation must specify what those other amounts are for. The court will not approve a stipulation requiring the payment of an obligation that is not enforceable under the lease or law. Translation: you can not include the payment of a landlord's attorney's fees in a stipulated dismissal for a residential eviction action.

6. The stipulation must be signed by all parties in the presence of the court or confirmed in the presence of the court by both parties.

7. If the tenant cannot appear in court to sign the stipulation than the landlord must file an affidavit that states the following:

a. The absent party has reviewed the stipulation and understands what it says.

b. The Landlord or its agent reviewed the stipulation with the absent party prior to signing and the affidavit shall name the person who reviewed the stipulation with the absent party.

c. The absent party agrees that they owe the amount they are agreeing to pay.

d. The absent party is signing the stipulation freely and voluntarily.

e. The absent party must have an "acceptable" reason for why they cannot come to court (such as employment obligations, education, or medical issues) and the court will determine if the reason is acceptable or not.

8. If the stipulation was signed by both parties in court and the tenant defaults by not paying one of the first 3 payments due under the stipulation, the landlord may file an affidavit of default with the court -- without notice to the tenant -- and the court will grant a judgment of eviction and issue a writ of restitution.

9. In all other instances than that stated in #8 above, the landlord will be required to give notice to the tenant stating when the landlord will be coming to court to file the affidavit of default and to obtain the judgment of eviction and the writ.

a. Notice to the tenant is required if the landlord does not come to court to obtain the writ before the 4th or subsequent payment is due under the stipulation.

b. Notice to the tenant is required if the stipulation was not signed by the tenant in court (or affirmed in court) regardless of whether or not the tenant has made any timely payments or not.

c. The notice to the tenant must include a letter identifying the overdue payment (by amount and due date) and explaining in clear and understandable terms that it is the landlord's intention is to ask the court for an eviction judgment and writ of restitution.

d. The notice must be served on the tenant by certified mail and first class mail. The landlord must file proof of mailing by certified mail with the court and an affidavit certifying that the notice was also served by first class mail with the court.

e. The landlord may not come to court to obtain the eviction judgment and writ unless at least seven (7) calendar days have passed after the date of mailing.

The new local rule is very different from how things had been handled with stipulated dismissals in eviction cases in the past. So landlords need to be aware of this new local rule and follow each and every requirement or risk the Court denying you the eviction judgment and writ that you will so desperately want and need at that point and time.

AASEW MEETING: Eviction Court Essentials -- Monday, August 19, 2013

The AASEW's next meeting will be this coming Monday, August 19, 2013 at 7 pm at the Best Western in Brookkfield.

The Apartment Association of Southeastern WI welcomes Milwaukee County Circuit Court Commissioner Cedric Cornwall as our main speaker at our August meeting. With all of the recent law changes in the landlord-tenant law arena, Commissioner Cornwall will speak to the group on the preferred procedures to follow in eviction court along with some of the common mistakes that he and his colleagues observe landlords making in court. As always, there will be time for questions for the Commissioner as well.

This is a must attend event for every owner of rental property in Milwaukee County and beyond. All always this event is free to members and 25 dollars for guests.

When: Monday, August 19th, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.

Where: The Best Western, 1005 S. Moorland Road, Brookfield 53005

Who: Eviction Court Commissioner Cedric S. Cornwall

Cost: Free for current AASEW members, $25 for guests and expired members.

About our speaker:

Cedric S. Cornwall has lived in Milwaukee County for 30 years and practiced law here for 27 years. A graduate of Marquette University Law School, he currently serves as a Milwaukee County Judicial Court Commissioner, where he presides over hearings in Children's Court, Small Claims Court, Intake Court, Preliminary Hearing Court, and Traffic Court. Assigned to the Vel R. Phillips Juvenile Justice Center, he also conducts settlement conferences, delinquency hearings, and permanency plan review hearings.

Commissioner Cornwall previously served as a Manager for the City of Milwaukee Equal Rights Commission and in the Trial Division of the Office of the Wisconsin State Public Defender, and was a partner in the Law Offices of Cornwall, Rhiel, and Yahahiro and in the small private firm he founded in 1999, where he gained extensive trial experience in criminal, juvenile, traffic, and supervision revocation cases. Commissioner Cornwall lives in Wauwatosa with his wife, Andrea, and their two daughters.

5 Things This Landlords' Attorney Wants For Christmas

With the coming of the holidays, comes list of gifts that people want for Christmas. So I thought I would put together one of my own. So here is a list of the top 5 things that this landlords' lawyer would like for Christmas.

5. That Tenants' Requests For Reasonable Accommodations To Allow for the Keeping of Companion/Comfort Animals Would Actually Be "Reasonable"

The past few years -- and especially this past year -- have seen a large rise in requests by tenants for a reasonable accommodation to landlords' "no pet" or "limited pet" policies specifically to allow for the keeping of a companion/comfort animal. A companion/comfort animal does not need to be specially trained and therefore can be any type of animal including the family dog, cat, gunea pig, or even a miniature horse. A tenant can ask for a reasonable accommodation -- and it should be provided -- as long as the tenant has a disability (i.e. an individual with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities) and the accommodation request has a "nexus" to the tenant's disability and will allow them to more fully enjoy a major life activity.

However, somewhere along the line tenants seem to have forgotten about the word "reasonable" in "reasonable accommodations."

It is not reasonable in my opinion to need 5 kittens as companion animals (which were recently born to a landlord-approved pet cat) just because the tenant thinks the kittens are cute and does not want to get rid of the litter.

It is not reasonable in my opinion for a tenant to request a pit bull dog as a reasonable accommodation just because the tenant's relative recently lost their home to foreclosure and can't find a place for their pet "pitty" to live.

It is not reasonable to have to allow a miniature horse as a companion animal because the tenant does not want to have a dog instead because dogs do not live as long as horses do, and if the dog should die it would exacerbate the tenant's mental health issues. Whereas the miniature horse will outlive the tenant so her mental health will be unaffected. Who cares what happens to the miniature horse after the tenant passes.

4. That Tenants Who File Bankruptcy Be Required To Disclose To The Bankruptcy Court That They Are Renters and that the Bankruptcy Court Create A More Efficient Process For The Tenant To "Pay and Stay" or Vacate

If a tenant files for bankruptcy something called the "automatic stay" kicks in that prevents any creditors (yes, that includes landlords) from attempting to collect a debt or in the case of landlords - evict a tenant. Now, tenant/debtors are supposed to disclose in their bankruptcy schedules that they file with the court whether or not they have any "executory contracts or unexpired leases." Without fail, tenants and there bankruptcy attorneys always check the box saying that they have no executory contracts or unexpired leases. I have handled at least 30 of these situations for my landlord clients and not once has the tenant advised the court that they were under an unexpired lease.

A landlord is then required to pay a filing fee, file a motion to lift the automatic stay, wait 14 days for the tenant to object, and if so participate in a hearing before the court, to present evidence that the tenant isn't paying their rent and the landlord should be allowed to proceed to evict the tenant. This process can be expensive and time consuming for a landlord whose hands are legally bound from doing anything until the bankruptcy court says he can.

It would be nice if the court or the bankruptcy trustee would confirm whether or not the debtor is a tenant and whether or not they are up to date with rent and if not, determine if the tenant can get caught up so s/he can stay, or advise the tenant/debtor that they must vacate the landlord's property.

To require a landlord jump through all of these hoops in order to remove a non-paying tenant from his rental property is just another financial drain on landlords. A landlord will spend at least one month (if not more) trying to lift the stay in bankruptcy court. Once that is completed, he then needs to serve the tenant with the appropriate notice, and after that time has elapsed, pay more money to file the eviction, and then wait another 2 weeks or so until the initial appearance in eviction court. As you can see, this process can delay things at least 2 months. So I would like to expedite this somehow. Wishful thinking I know . . . but hey, this is my wish list : )

3. That Tenants Stop Using Jury Trial Demands To "Buy" More Time In Evictions

In my 17+ years of law practice I have probably encountered somewhere between 10-15 requests for a jury trial by a tenant that I am evicting. Not one of those cases have ever resulted in an actual jury being selected. Instead the demand is often made just because it will prolong the case. In Milwaukee County when a jury trial demand is made, the case is tabbed to a large claims judge who often has a very busy caseload and is unable to even get the case into court for a Scheduling Conference for 2 months. Oftentimes, a trial isn't scheduled for months after the Scheduling Conference. On the other hand if a jury trial is not made, the small claims judge in Milwaukee County can hear the eviction within a week in most cases.

I have had jury trial demands filed in failure to pay rent cases where the tenant has no legal defense. Tenant didn't pay rent, notice was properly served, tenant didn't pay past due rent within cure period, and an eviction lawsuit was field. Tenant doesn't deny any of it but wants a jury trial. Now my client gets to sit for months with a non-paying tenant before obtaining a judgement of eviction. And no, landlords rarely ever see those rent amounts from the tenant even if they obtain a money judgment against them later because many tenants are not collectible.

I have had jury trial demands filed in cases where the tenant is being evicted for engaging in criminal activity that is scaring (and at times injuring) fellow tenants and neighbors. Yet, with the jury demand having been made, the landlord, along with the law-abiding tenants and neighbors, have to deal with the scofflaw tenant for months, unless they by chance would get arrested.

The law needs to be changed in this regard. While jury trials are an important part of the judicial system this practice that I am seeing more and more of is clearly an abuse of the system. Perhaps requiring that all jury trials must be held within so many days of the initial appearance or in failure to pay rent cases requiring that all past due rent must be paid up and future rent continue to be paid or the tenant loses his/her right to the jury trial. Something needs to happen to stop this frivolous practice.

2. That All Courts Follow the Law with Regard To Granting "Stays" in Eviction Actions

Sec. 799.44(3), Wis. Stats., is very clear that before a court is allowed to "stay" a writ that the tenant must pay all rent and other charges due as well as any rent that will become due during the period of the "stay." This law is often ignored by the courts to landlords' detriment.

I understand that it is difficult to tell a tenant that you are ordering them to immediately vacate the rental property even when the cause of their non-payment of rent is due to no fault of their own - such as losing a job due to downsizing or health issues -- but that is what the law says. If it is a bad law (and I am not saying that it is) then it can and should be changed through the legislative process.

Let me put this in another context. A tenant that has lost their job or that has encountered a serious medical issue may also not have money to buy food for their family, but that doesn't mean that they are allowed to shoplift food from the grocery store. If they did that they would be arrested.

So why is a landlord required to provide housing for a tenant who's tenancy has been properly terminated and after all proper legal channels have been followed? What makes a landlord so special that s/he gets this special treatment that places them in a different category than any other creditor. Why is a landlord required to house the non-paying tenant to the landlord's financial detriment and risk their ability to continue to provide housing for their paying tenants. Again, for those non-landlords that may be reading this post, most tenants are not collectible, so saying that the landlord will be made whole when they obtain a money judgment against the tenant is not realistic.

1. That All Landlords Join a Landlord Association (such as the Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin - AASEW)

There are more private landlords in Wisconsin than there are teachers but landlords' voices are not anywhere near as powerful as are teachers. The reason for this is that landlords are not organized. Landlords tend to be an independent type that enjoy being their own bosses. That is well and good but landlords need to set that independent spirit aside on occasion for the betterment of themselves and all landlords. Only when landlords unit can positive change occur for them as there is strength in numbers. It is very difficult to survive financially as a landlord these days. But by joining a landlord association, a landlord's life can become a little easier. First, through landlord associations, landlords can create a united voice to challenge bad legislation or champion new legislation. Secondly, landlord associations provide educational opportunities for their members on changes in the law so landlords can stay out of legal trouble. Third, there is camaraderie in joining a landlord association which allows members to rub elbows with other landlords may be facing, or have previously faced, the same struggles that you are having.

If all landlords joined a landlord association and became active in them, we have the money and the numbers to create change that would assist our industry.

____

Oh by the way Santa - if you cant give me any of my wishes on this list, I will settle for a new toy bike with red and white streamers dangling from the handlebars : )

Happy Holidays everyone!

Milwaukee Co. Eviction Court Closure Dates Through End of Year

Milwaukee County just advised many of us that Eviction Court (room 400 only) will be closed the following days:

- Friday, November 2, 2012

- Friday, November 23, 2012

- Friday, December 14, 2012

- Monday, December 24, 2012

- Monday, December 31, 2012

Note: These closures do NOT apply to Judge Kuhnmuench's courtroom in room 409.

Judge Mary Kuhnmuench Will Be New Small Claims/Eviction Judge in Milwaukee County

In Milwaukee County we get a new small claims/eviction judge each year around August 1st or so. Most judicial rotations are three years long but for some reason --- possibly the high volume, tediousness, pro se litigants, stress level --- the small claims judge rotates every year.

Milwaukee County's new small claims/eviction judge effective July 27, 2012, will be Mary M. Kuhnmuench. Judge Kuhnmuench is currently completing her rotation in criminal misdemeanor court.

Judge Kuenhmuench was elected in 1998, and re-elected in both 2004 and 2010. Prior to being a judge she was an Assistant City Attorney in Milwaukee, an in-house corporate attorney at A.O. Smith and and adjunct professor of business law at Alverno College.

Milwaukee County Releases Dates That Eviction Court Will Be Closed in 2012

Milwaukee County recently released all dates that Eviction Court will be closed in 2012. Most of them are obvious closings for holidays but there are a few that are not holiday-related.

So make sure you don't schedule a return date in eviction court for any of these days:

May 4, 2012

May 28, 2012

July 4, 2012

September 3, 2012

November 2, 2012

November 23, 2012

December 24, 2012

December 25, 2012

December 31, 2012

You Will Not Want To Miss AASEW's Fourth Annual Landlord Boot Camp on Saturday Feb. 25th

Landlording can be pretty complex, with a seemingly never ending myriad of paperwork, rules, landlord-tenant laws and simple mistakes that can cost you thousands of dollars.

The Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin's Fourth Annual “Landlord Boot Camp” can help you navigate these treacherous waters and teach you how to run your properties with greater profit and less hassles.

I have given similar landlord-tenant law seminars to fellow attorneys, landlords, and property manager organizations throughout the state for other state-wide semianr companies that charge attendees $300-$400. This is your opportunity to learn all of the same information at a huge discount through the Apartment Association.

Who: Taught by Attorney Tristan R. Pettit (who drafts the landlord tenant forms for Wisconsin Legal Blank)

When: Saturday, February 25th, 2012. 8:30 am – 5 pm

Where: Clarion Hotel 5311 S. Howell Avenue, Milwaukee [Map]

Included: 100 plus page manual/outline to help you put what you learn into practice plus helpful forms.

Cost: $159 for AASEW members and $249 for non-members. If you are not a member of AASEW but are a member of another landlord/apartment association the cost to attend will be $199.

Specials: Not a member? Pay just a dollar more and enjoy a 2012 AASEW membership.

Wisconsin landlord-tenant laws are constantly changing. To help keep you up to date we offer prior attendees a $50 discount.

Sign up by going to the AASEW's Landlord Boot Camp landing page where you can sign up online and pay via PayPal.

What you will learn at the Apartment Association's 2012 Landlord Boot Camp

Landlord Boot Camp covers everything that you need to know about residential Landlord Tenant law in Wisconsin, including:

1. How to properly screen prospective tenants.
2. How to draft written screening criteria to assist you in the selection process and protect you from discrimination complaints.
3. How to comply with both federal and state Fair Housing laws including how to handle with “reasonable modifications” and “reasonable accommodations” requests.
4. How to legally reject an applicant.
5. What rental documents you should be using and why.
6. When you should be using a 5-day notice versus a 14-day notice, 28-day notice, or 30-day notice and how to properly serve the notice on your tenant.
7. Everything you wanted to know (and probably even more than you wanted to know) about the Residential Rental Practices (ATCP 134) and how to avoid having to pay double damages to your tenant for breaching ATCP 134.
8. When you are legally allowed to enter your tenant’s apartment.
9. How to properly draft an eviction summons and complaint.
10. What to do to keep the commissioner from dismissing your eviction suit.
11. What you can legally deduct from a security deposit.
12. How to properly draft a security deposit transmittal / 21 day letter.
13. How to handle pet damage.
14. What to do with a tenant’s abandoned property and how this may affect whether or not you file an eviction suit.
15. How to pursue your ex-tenant for damages to your rental property and past due rent (and whether it is even worth it to do so).

. . . and much more. There will also be time for questions and answers.

You get all this for less than you would pay for an hour of an attorney's time.

Last year’s AASEW Landlord Boot Camp was filled to capacity and we even had to turn a few people away. So call early to reserve your spot.

Call the Association at (414) 276-7378, email membership@apartmentassoc.org or go to our Landlord Boot Camp landing page to sign up online and reserve your spot.

Remember that “landlording” is a business — so take the time to educate yourself on how to better manage your business and avoid costly errors!

Don't Miss the 2nd Annual East Side Landlord Think Small Conference on Wednesday November 9, 2011

I will be the featured speaker at the upcoming East Side Landlord Think Small Conference on Wednesday, November 9, 2011 from 3 pm - 6:30 pm at UW-Milwaukee, Chapman Hall located at 2310 E. Hartford Avenue, in the Regent's Room on the 2nd floor.

This conference is FREE to any and all interested landlords, with a special focus on Milwaukee's East Side landlords.

This conference is composed of 3 componants:

1. Featured Speaker - I will be speaking on the issues of "Causes for Eviction and Termination of Tenancy" and "Notices Terminating Tenancy." You will learn about the 4 basic notices that can be served on a residential tenant in Wisconsin (5 day, 14 day, 28 day and 30 day notices) and when you should be using each notice and why. While no one wants to have to evict a tenant . . . sometimes it is necessary. At the very least, landlords need to become comfortable with the various notice that can be served on a tenant when a tenant breaches his/her rental agreement or the landlord wants to terminate the tenant's tenancy. I will also discuss the proper way to serve a tenant with one of these notices. I will be handing out a detailed 11 page outline on this topic that attendees can take home to refer to when needed in the future. Examples of properly drafted 5 day, 14 day, 28 day, and 30 day notices will also be distributed.

2. Round Table Discussion - This discussion will include a panel of UW-Milwaukee staff, City of Milwaukee staff, myself, and others and will focus on local topics and common problems that East Side landlords encounter.

3. Panel of Experts - The panel will be comprised of members of the Milwaukee Police Department, Campus Police Department, Department of Public Works, Department of Neighborhood Services, and UW-Milwaukee Department of Neighborhood Housing and who will field any questions that you may have.

There will also be time to network with other landlords.

If you are interested in attending please RSVP to Heather Harbach, UW-Milwaukee Neighborhood Relations Liason at (414) 229-4451 or harbach@uwm.edu. You can also register for the event by clicking here.

I hope to see everyone there!!

Revised Small Claims Summons Required To Be Used As of November 1, 2011

In a prior post I explained that the small claims jurisdictional limit was increased from $5,000 to $10,000 as of July 1, 2011. This change has necessitated a revision to the mandatory small claims summons form that is required to be used when filing an eviction, replevin, and collection actions under $10,000 (as well as arbitrations confirmations and personal injury claims less than $5,000).

So far, the Clerk of Courts has been accepting filings using the old mandatory summons (1 page form) as well as the revised mandatory summons (2 page form). However, as of November 1, 2011, they will only be accepting the new 2 page summons - SC-500. Remeber that in Milwaukee County you are required to use the Summons that is written in both English and Spanish. All mandatory small claims forms can be found here.

So if you still have some of the old forms available make sure you use them all up by October 31st.

Don't have your eviction delayed because you are using an outdated form!

Milwaukee County Eviction Court Commissioner To Speak At Next AASEW Meeting on Oct. 17th

On Monday, October 17, 2011, Milwaukee County Eviction Court Commissioner Rosa Barillas will speak at the Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin's general membership meeting.

The meeting will start at 7 pm and be held at the Best Western Midway Hotel located at 1005 S. Moorland Road in Brookfield, WI.

Commissioner Barillas will speak to the group about mistakes that she sees landlords make in eviction court and how they can avoid them. She will also be taking questions.

If you have never been to an AASEW meeting (or haven't been to one in awhile) please join me at our next meeting on October 17, 2011. You will not be sorry.

T

Milwaukee County Eviction Court "Odds & Ends"

I wanted to update everyone about some recent news in Milwaukee County Eviction Court. Each of the items are too small for there own blog post, so I thought I would combine them as "Odds & Ends." This might be a regular blog post column in the future : )

1. Out with the old and in with the new -- commissioners, that is.

Most of the court commissioners that had been serving in small claims/eviction court have rotated out onto other assignments. Thh only commissioner that remains from the last group is Court Commissioner Rosa Barillas. Commissioners Julia Vosper, Barry Phillips, and Dennis Cook have all rotated out. The new commissoners include: Grace Flynn, Cedric Cornwall, and Kevin Costello, all of which have served a small claims/eviction court rotation before. Chief Court Commissioner Laura Grambling-Perez will also assist in small claims/eviction court. Since the rotation I have also seen Commissioner Barry Phillips stopping by to help out when needed. However, the court commisioners that are now officially assigned to Eviction court currently are Rosa Barillas, Grace Flynn, Cedric Cornwall and Kevin Costello.

2. New Judge takes over Small Claims calandar as of August 1st

Most judicial rotations last 3 years, but due to the high volume and stress level of small claims court, the rotation for a small claims duty judge is only for one year. As of Agust 1, 2011, Judge Jane Carroll will be rotating into another division and Judge Paul Van Grunsven (currently filling a Felony Drug rotation) will be the new small claims duty judge.

3. Eviction Court closure dates

Eviction court will be closed tomorrow, Thursday, May 5th, and Friday, May 6th. I don't believe that the clerks in the Clerks of Courts office have allowed any cases to be filed for those days -- so expect a higher case load next week.

Eviction Court will also be closed on Thursday, May 12, 2011. Many cases have already been scheduled for that day but since no court commissioners will be available to hear/review/decide any cases, any cases that are currently scheduled for May 12th will need to be rescheduled. As such, if you have any cases scheduled for May 12th (as I do) you still must come to court and the clerks (Henrietta and Dyan) will give you a new court date.

Eviction Court will also be closed on Monday, May 30th, for Memorial Day.

New Rule In Milwaukee County Eviction Court Will Limit The Number of New Evictions to 80 Per Day

In an effort to eliminate the congestion in eviction court, Milwaukee County has imposed a limit of 80 new eviction cases per day. In the past there have been days in which over 300 new eviction cases were scheduled to be heard in the same afternoon, which often became unmanageble.

This new limit only applies to new case filings for eviction cases (the 1st cause of action) for return of the property. This new limit does not include evidentiary hearings, adjourned matters, or return dates for 2nd and 3rd causes of actions (for money damages).

I was informed that the Clerk of Courts will be keeping a running tally of eviction cases scheduled for each return date/initial appearance. Once that tally reaches 80, no more cases will be allowed to be filed for that same return date.

While I understand the reasoning for this new policy, I do have some concerns. I agree that eviction court can become unmanageable due to the high volume of cases. Us "regulars" to eviction court have had to spend much of our lives sitting and waiting in good ol' room 400 of the Milwaukee County Courthouse due to the high volume. Despite that I have always had my cases completed before 5 pm.

I work for several clients that have a high volume of evictions each month. One client in particular easily has 40 evictions per month and has topped out at 66 evictions on more than one occassion. In order to keep costs down for such clients I schedule all of that client's evictions to be heard on the same day. This limits the amount of fees that they client has to pay me and allows them to only spend one day per month in court.

This new policy may prevent that client, and other landlords similarily situated, from having all of their cases heard on the same day --- thus increasing their costs and encroaching on their valuable time. Let's face it evicting a tenant is a a money-loser to a landlord. It is a necessary evil that they would like to keep to a minimum if at all possible.

Another foreseeable issue would be the landlord that has a smaller number of evictions each month -- say 10 -- who wants to have them all heard on one day in eviction court. What will happen when s/he goes to file the evictions and is told that there are only 3 spots left for evictions on the day s/he wanted to appear in court? That landlord weill either have to scheduled his/her 7 remaining evictions on a different day or choose to postpone all 10 evictions to another day in order to have them all heard at once. The former option wil require the landlord to spend 2 days in eviction court. the latter option will result in a non-paying tenant having additional time to live rent free. Either option causes the landlord money.

So while I understand the motivation for this new rule I am not sure that it will benefit Milwaukee County landlords. We will have to wait and see.

SMALL CLAIMS BENCH/BAR MEETING: Milwaukee County Gives Clarification Regarding Including Late Fees In 5 Day Notices and Other Issues

The Milwaukee County Small Claims court has reinstituted its monthly Bench/Bar meetings. These meetings allow the Milwaukee County Small Claims Court, including Judge Jane Carroll (presiding small claims judge) and the court commissioners, to come together with attorneys that appear regularly in small claims court, to discuss issues and concerns.

The most recent small claims bench/bar meeting was held on Monday, December 6, 2010. I was able to attend the meeting and found it to be very insightful. The meeting was attended by attorneys for tenants (Legal Action of Wisconsin, Inc.), attorneys for landlords (myself and a few others), the attorney for the AASEW, court commissioners, small claims judge, and other court staff. The overall response to the meeting was very good and Judge Carroll indicated that another meeting would be scheduled in January.

It was very enlightening -- and helpful -- to hear everyone discuss issues of concern and to learn the thought process behind certain rules and procedures in small claims court.

For those of you that could not attend the meeting, I have attempted to provide a summary of the discussion, below:

- Judge Carroll explained that she felt that nothing was wrong with a landlord including a late fee in a 5 day notice as long as the tenant was under a lease for a term as opposed to a month to month or other periodic tenancy.

Back in March of 2009 or so, when Judge Siefert was still the small claims judge, evictions were being dismissed if the landlord included late fees in the 5 day notice which was served on the tenant. Here is a post on that topic that I previously wrote.

It was origianlly explained to me several months ago, that the reason for this new policy was that the court was now reading the statute very strictly, and sec. 704.17(1), Wis. Stats. (regarding notices in month to month situations and other periodic tenancies) and sec. 704.17(2), Wis. Stats. (regarding notices in leases for a specific term) said that a 5 day notice could be given to a tenant for failure to pay "rent." "Rent" was strictly interpreted to include rent -- not late fees, security deposit amounts not paid, damages owed etc.

The discussion on this issue at the bench/bar meeting clarified that the court considered a tenant's failure to pay a late fee to be a "breach of a covenant or condition of the tenant's agreement" rather than a failure to pay rent and therefore a landlord would need to use a different 5 day notice -- one for breach other than failure to pay rent -- as opposed to a 5 day notice for failure to pay rent, in that particular cotext.

Judge Carroll said that she saw no problem with a landlord combining the two notices, as long as the tenant was under a lease for term, thus allowing a landlord to include a late fee in a 5 day notice for failure to pay rent.

The combining of notices (to include a late fee and the past due rent amount) would NOT be allowed (and could result in the dismissal of an eviction) if the tenant was under a periodic tenancy, such as a month to month tenancy. The reason for this distinction is that the Wisconsin Statutes do not allow a landlord to serve a tenant with a 5 day notice for the breach of lease for other than non-payment of rent. If there is a breach of the lease for anything other than the non-payment of rent, in a month to month or other periodic tenancy, the Wisconsin Statutes require that a 14 day notice be used.

The court further explained that if a tenant was under a month to month or other periodic tenancy, that a landlord could combine the notices (failure to pay rent and breach of agreement other than failure to pay rent) into a 14 day notice if the landlord wanted to include a late fee along with the rent owed. It should be noted however that 14 day notices do not allow a tenant the opportunity to cure the breach.

If this sounds confusing to you, you are not alone -- IT IS CONFUSING!! This is an example of the minutia of the law.

A quick summary:

1. It is OK to include a late fee in a 5 day notice for failure to pay rent as long as the tenant is under a lease for term (as opposed to a periodic tenancy like a month to month).

2. It is NOT OK to include a late fee in a 5 day notice for failure to pay rent if the tenant is a month to month tenant. In that case the 5 day can only list rent owed OR the landlord should use a 14 day notice if the landlord wants to include a late fee.

Truthfully, I think the above will cause more confusion for landlords that are representing themselves (pro se) and for attorneys who do not specialize in landlord-tenant law. To keep things simple I am still going to reccomend that my Milwaukee County landlord clients not include late fees in their 5 day notices.

- Small claims court will NOT be splitting up the 2 pm (initial appearance on evictions) court calandar as it did last year.

Many of you may recall the attempt by the courts to reduce the amount of people sitting in room 400 during the flu season last year. The goal was to prevent people from spreading the flu and so the court split the eviction calandar in half and made some landlords appear at 2 pm and others appear at 3 pm.

If you were a landord or attorney with multiple properties having multiple owners (some with names in the beginning of the alphabet and some toward the end of the alphabet), this often met you were stuck in small claims court even longer than usual. Even with the splitting of the court's calandar there were still a lot of people sitting in room 400 at one time - so I'm not sure that the transmission of the flu was really reduced. I was happy to learn that the court would be forgoing this splitting of the calandar this season.

- The court asked for everyone's thoughts regarding requiring a landlord to provide written notice to a tenant that defaults on a stipulated dismissal, in all circumstances.

Currently, if a tenant enters into a stipulated dismissal of an eviction action and agrees to either vacate by a date certain or remain in the unit and pay past due rent under a payment plan, and the tenant defaults on the stipulation, a landlord may come to court and file an Affidavit of Default and obtain a judgment of eviction and a writ of restitution WITHOUT having to provide the tenant with any notice.

Under a slightly different scenario, it is the policy of small claims court currently, that if the tenant enters into such a stipulated dismissal outside of court (i.e. signs the stipulation at the office of the landlord) and therefore neither the court nor the landlord's attorney explains the stipulation to the tenant, and should the tenant default, the landlord MUST provide written notice to the tenant of the default and provide the tenant with the date and time that the landlord will be coming to court to request the judgment of eviction and writ.

Judge Carroll expressed concern that some of these stipulations, notably those that involve payments that will occur several months into the future, should possibly require written notice to the tenant. Judge Carroll indicated that in some of the stipulated dismissals that she approves in her court (as opposed to those approved by the court commissioners in room 400) she requires the landlord to provide written notice to the tenant of the default, if the default occurs 5 months or more after the stipulation was entered into. Judge Carroll's concern was that some tenants would default on the stipulation and think they were working things out with the landlord to remedy the default, only to be surprised when the Sheriff was at the door ready to evict the tenant, thus leaving the tenant little time to move.

Many suggestions and opinions were offerred during the discussion. I indicated that requiring another level of notice to the tenant would just cause further delay to the landlord in getting possession of his/her rental property and would allow the tenant another opportunity to argue that they didnt receive the "notice" and therefore should have additional time to vacate. One suggestion was to require landlords to send a letter via regular U.S. mail to the tenant within 48 hours after going into court to file the Affidavit of Default and obtaining the eviction judgment and the writ. Another suggestion was to require such notice only in situations in which the landlord and tenant modified (orally or in writing) the terms of the stipulated dismissal. Yet another suggestion was to require such a notice only when the default occurred X number of months after the stipulation was entered into.

No decision was made to modfify the notice requirements in defaults of stipulated dismissals but the court appreciated everyone's thoughts and input and indicated that the topic may be addressed again in the future.

- Judge Carroll expressed concern with "proving up" modifications to stipulated dismissals or other agreements.

Judge Carroll indicated that she has witnessed many instances in which a landlord, who has already received a judgment of eviction and a writ, would then attempt to work with a tenant so that they could remain in the unit, rather than executing that writ with the Sheriff. Nothing is wrong with attempting to work to keep the tenant in the unit in, Judge Carroll explained,but what is a problemis that these agreements are not being put in writing. To avoid confusion, and possibly additional litigation, she emphasized that any agreement resulting from such negotiations should ber put in writing. Modifications to previosuly enetered into agreements are not being put in writing and this is resulting in the Court seeing a lot of "he said, she said" sitautions.

The practical effect of failing to memorialize such agreements or modifications often results in the scenario below:

At some point in time the landlord decides to stop working with the tenant to keep them in the rental unit, and tenders the writ to the Sheriff. The Sheriff gives the tenant a 24 hour notice before executing the writ which causes the tenant to run into court and file a motion to reopen the judgment of eviction. The tenant argues that while a writ was granted to the landlord, since that time the landlord began to work with the tenant to allow them to remain in the unit. The landlord told the tenant that they could stay if they did X and Y (or at least that is what the tenant "heard") and the tenant has done X and Y, so the landlord should not be allowed to have the writ executed becasue of the new agreement. The court then schedules a hearing on the tenant's motion to reopen the eviction judgment -- which results in a stay of the execution of the writ. The landlord now has to appear in court again and both the tenant and the landlord have differernt versions of their discussions and the court has to sort through all of this -- with nothing in writing to support either side's argument.

The court understands that landlords would often like keep a tenant if possible, and that is the reason for a landlord attempting to "work with" a tenant even after a writ has been obtained. But as Judge Carroll pointed out, because these modification are not put in writing there is often disagreements as to what was agreed to between the parties.

My thoughts on this issue are simple: (1) If you have a writ, execute it and remove the tenant from your rental property -- the time for trying to work with the tenant so that they can remain in the unit is long past if you have filed an eviction action against them, in my opinion, or (2) if you still want to work with the tenant so that they can remain in the unit at this late date ----- put the agreement in writing, using clear and simple terms tht the tenant, the landlord, and the court, can understand and interpret.

Milwaukee County Eviction Court Schedule For The Holidays

For those of you scheduling evictions in Milwaukee County, eviction court will be closed on the following days:

- Thursday, December 23, 2010

- Friday, December 24, 2010

- Thursday, December 30, 2010

- Friday, December 31, 2010

EXECUTION OF WRIT: Part 2 - The Details

Last week I provided some basic information about what is involved in the execution of a writ of restitution (eviction) and how the process works. With this week's post I wanted to provide everyone with some additional -- more detailed -- information about the execution process. I attempted to group these tidbits of info by category. Much of the information below is specific to Milwaukee County and the Milwaukee County eviction squad.

General

- The applicable Wisconsin Statute regarding executing a writ is 799.45, Wis. Stats.

- Milwaukee County Eviction Squad's phone number is (414) 278-5030.

- A typical eviction move-out takes 1 hour.

- Approximately 15-20 evictions are performed per day.

- There is both a 1st and a 2nd shift that performs evictions. The 1st shift arrives at the office around 7 am. The 2nd shift works until 8 pm.

- The landlord should alert the Sheriff if any of the following apply: (1) the tenant has mental health issues, (2) there are dangerous dogs residing in the unit, (3) the tenants are believed to be involved with drug dealing, (4) there are guns on the property, (5) the tenant is elderly and/or disabled and has no place to move to or family to assist him/her.

The reason that the Sheriff wants to be notified of (1) - (4) is for the Sheriff's own safety. If there is a mentally unstable tenant, dogs, drugs, guns, or some other factor that might result in the increased risk of injury, the Sheriff wants to be notified of this in advance so that they can have back-up near by. The execution of a writ can be very dangerous. Tenants who are being displaced from their homes are often emotional (understandably so). I have heard of Sheriff's deputies being injured and even killed while performing an eviction. If a landlord has any inkling that there could be issues during the eviction this should be communicated to the Sheriff's Department.

The reason that the Sheriff wants to be notified of (5) (if the tenant is elderly and/or disabled and has no family to assist or place to move to) is because the Sheriff will then contact the Department of Aging or a social service agency prior to the eviction so that someone can be on hand to assist the elderly and/or disabled person in locating a safe place.

The best way to notify the Sheriff of any of the above conditions is to attach a note to the paperwork that you are filing with the Sheriff. This way the clerk can pass that note along to the eviction squad along with the Writ.

- After the tenant's property has been removed, the tenant and any other individuals living in the unit will be escorted out of the unit. The Sheriff will put a placard on the door. If the tenant returns and enters the unit after the eviction has occurred the police should be called. The Sheriff cannot make a tenant leave the apartment complex or neighborhood as the Sheriff only has the authority to remove the tenant from the unit.

Eviction Route

- The eviction squad performs all evictions on the south side of Milwaukee first and then they move to the north side.

Notification To Landlord

- The Sheriff will do its best to notify the landlord of the date and time for the eviction on three different occassions: (1) the night before the eviction is scheduled, (2) at 7:30 a.m. the morning of the scheduled eviction, and (3) as they are driving to the property to perform the eviction.

Moving Companies

- Certain moving companies are used only on certain days of the week in Milwaukee County. So a landlord does have some control over what day of the week his/her eviction will occur by choosing who to hire as the moving company. If Eagle Movers has been retained then the Sheriff will schedule the eviction for Monday, Wednesday, or Friday. If Aetna Movers are hired then the eviction will occur on a Tuesday. If Dweyer Movers (owned by Eagle Movers) are used then the eviction will be on a Thursday. Wednesdays are reserved for JC Triplett.

Appliances

- If the landlord provides appliances with his/her rental unit then the landlord should notify the Sheriff of this. The landlord should also provide the Sheriff with information about the type of appliances, manufacturer, color etc. If the Sheriff is not advised of this information and the tenant tells the moving company that the appliances are his/hers, there is little the Sheriff can do to prevent this type of theft.

Storage Lockers

- If the tenant has property stored in a storage locker which needs to be removed, the Sheriff needs to be told of this. If the landlord does not know which storage locker is the tenant's, the Sheriff will not remove any items from any of the lockers as they could be held responsible if they remove items from the wrong storage locker.

Tenant's Personal Property

- The Sheriff has the authority to decide what of the tenant's belongings are of no value (junk) and what is valuable and should be packed and moved to storage.

- Neither the Sheriff nor the moving company will remove a tenant's clothing. This rule is in place for safety reasons because in the past the Sheriff/movers were stuck by needles that were left in clothing.

- Only large items will be removed. Smaller items will be left in the unit for the landlord to remove.

- If the tenant's property is infested with roaches, bed bugs, or some other critter, the items will NOT be moved. Moldy items will also not be placed into the moving truck. The moving companies do not want to help spread these infestations throughout the city so the removal of such property will be left to the landlord.

- Once the Sheriff determines what is junk/garbage, the landlord then has a choice to either leave the junk in the property (which the landlord can then remove later) or have the moving company haul everything to the curve (which the moving company will charge the landlord for doing).

- If a tenant is present, and his/her property is determiend to be of value, the tenant is given a choice as to what should be done with his/her belongings. The property can be moved and placed into storage (which the tenant will then be required to pay for if s/he wants the possessions back) or the tenant can opt to have his/her property placed at the curb (for the tenant to remove).

- If a tenant's personal property is going to be placed into storage, the moving company must put the property into boxes, which the landlord will pay for. While it is frustrating for the landlord to have to pay for boxes to house the tenant's property, the moving company cannot just throw the tenant's belongings haphazardly into the back of the truck for many reasons (safety and liability are two that come to mind). The property will also be inventoried.

Liability for Execution of Void Writ

- The Sheriff will be liable to the tenant for any damages resulting from the execution of a writ that was given to the Sheriff beyond the 30 day period. The Sheriff will also be liable for any resulting damages if the Sheriff executes a writ beyond the 10 day period. Wolfe-Lille v. Kenosha County Sheriff, 699 F. 2d 864 (7th Cir. 1983).

Cancellation of Writ

- Landlord must have the docket number that was giving at the time that the paperwork was filed with the Sheriff, in order to cancel an eviction. Only the Sheriff and the landlord are given the docket number. The tenant should NEVER be given the docket number or else s/he could cancel their own eviction.

- If a landlord cancels an eviction, the Sheriff discards the paperwork. As a result, a landlord cannot "un-cancel" an execution of the writ. A landlord should never cancel the eviction with the Sheriff unless they are certain that the tenant has vacated.

Costs of Execution

- The Sheriff charges $112.50 per hour for their time in executing a writ.

- The total cost to execute the writ will be based on the actual hours expended by the Sheriff. The costs will be taken out of the $130 deposit that was previously posted. Any remaining monies will be returned to the landlord within 4-8 weeks. If the total cost exceeds the $130 deposit, the Sheriff will send a bill for the overage.

- The cost of the Sheriff and the moving company are all chargeable to the landlord. However these costs will be taxed and added to any money judgment that the landlord pursues against the tenant -- whether or not the judgment is collectible, is a whole different issue.

- The only costs that are the truly the responsibility of the tenant (aside from if the landlord obtains a judgment against the tenant and actually collects on it) are the costs incurred for the storage of the tenant's belongings after the delivery of the property to the storage facility.

EXECUTION OF WRIT: Part 1 - The Basics

I have noticed a trend in the last several months of more and more tenants refusing to leave a landlord's rental property even after the landlord has obtained a judgment of eviction against the tenant and been issued a Writ of Restitution ("writ"). As a result of this trend more and more landlords are being forced to go through the process of having the writ executed. The execution of the writ is the process whereby the Sheriff actually removes the non-vacating tenant and returns possession of the property to the landlord.

Background Information:

Most eviction lawsuits have 3 causes of action or claims. The first cause of action is for return of the rental property. This is often referred to as the "eviction" portion and in Milwaukee County it is called the "1st cause of action." The 2nd and 3rd causes of action have to do with the money that the tenant might owe the landlord. The 2nd cause refers to the past due rent that may be owed and the 3rd cause refers to any claims for physical damages to the unit and/or holdover damages. Together the 2nd and 3rd causes of action are often referred to as the "money claims."

This post will focus on the 1st cause of action generally, and specifically, on what a landlord must do s/he has been granted a judgment of eviction and received a writ of restitution but the tenant continues to reside in the unit.

A landlord typically obtains a judgment of eviction (and the ensuing writ) in one of three ways. First, the tenant fails to show for court and the landlord is granted a default judgment. Second, the tenant appears in court and contests the eviction thus necessitating an eviction trial before a judge. Assuming the landlord proves his/her case, the landlord obtains a judgment of eviction and is issued a writ. Third, the tenant appears in court and admits that they are in breach of the lease and the court commissioner or judge grants a judgment of eviction against the tenant based on his/her admission and issues a writ.

Many landlords mistakenly believe that after they obtain a judgment of eviction and a writ that they can then change the locks and toss out the tenants personal property if the tenant fails to leave. DO NOT DO THIS. If the tenant fails to vacate the unit, even after there has been a judgment and a writ issued, the only legal way to remove the tenant is to hire the Sheriff and to have the writ executed (sec. 799.45, Wis. Stats.) If a landlord attempts to illegally evict a tenant (also referred to as a "self-help" eviction) th elandlord is openeing himself/herself up to either civil or criminal liability, or both. The tenant can sue the landlord that engaged in a self-help eviction for double damages and attorney fees. While it may seem "unfair" to require the landlord to expend more time and money after s/he has already obtained a judgment of eviction against a non paying tenant, that is what the law requires.

The Writ of Restitution:

Along with obtaining a judgement of eviction comes the issuance of a Writ of Restitution (writ). A writ is a document that orders the Sheriff to evict the tenant and anyone else that has occupancy of the rental unit. The writ also contains additional information that will assist the Sheriff in executing the writ, such as the name and address and phone number of the landlord, the landlord's attorney, and the defendant/tenant.

In Milwaukee County the court does not give you a writ. Instead the court gives you an Authorization for Writ. The landlord must then take that Authorization to the Clerk of Courts and pay $5 in order to obtain the actual writ. The landlord must then complete the writ and tender it to the Sheriff.

Each county handles the distribution of the writ differently. In Waukesha County (at least last time I was there) a landlord is required to return to court the following day to obtain the writ and pay the fee. The Clerk completes the writ for you in Waukesha. In Racine County, a landlord should pick up a blank writ from the Clerk of Courts before court, complete all the requested information on the writ, and then present it to the judge when the case is called and the judge will sign the writ. No fee is required in Racine County. In Kenosha County, a landlord must go to the Clerk of Courts after court and pay $5 and the Clerk will then complete the writ for you and hand it to you. It is advisable to talk to the Clerk of Courts in whatever county you own rental property about the process of obtaining the writ before you appear in court.

A writ is only valid for 30 days. If a landlord does not tender the writ to the Sheriff within the 30 day period the writ will expire and the landlord will need to start the entire eviction process over again in order to remove a tenant that is still residing in the property. Yep, you heard me correctly. If the landlord lets the writ expire, the landlord will need to serve the tenant with a new notice, purchase a new summons and have it filed and served on the tenant, appear in court again etc. etc. Do not let the writ expire! New landlords (or landlords with no previous eviction experience) should not let a tenant dupe them into not filing the writ with the Sheriff within the 30 day period. Tenants may tell you that they just need 10 more days, and then another 5 days, and then 3 more days and they will be out, etc. etc. If all those extra days add up to 30 - the landlord has only himself/herself to blame.

Executing The Writ:

In Milwaukee County, only the Sheriff can legally execute the writ. Before the Sheriff will do this however the landlord must hire a moving company. The landlord must obtain a Letter of Authority from a licensed and bonded moving company and in return the landlord will have to shell out a refundable deposit of approximately $350 to the movers.

Once the landlord has engaged the services of a moving company the landlord should go to the Sheriff's Department for Milwaukee County and bring along the following items:

1. The Authorization for Writ

2. The fully completed Writ of Restitution

3. $130 deposit to give to the Sheriff

4. A set of keys to the unit to give to the Sheriff.

By law, once the writ has been delivered to the Sheriff, the Sheriff must execute the writ within the next 10 days (sec. 799.45(5), Wis. Stats.) Due to the large amount of evictions in Milwaukee, it typically takes the Sheriff the full 10 days. Oftentimes the Milwaukee County Sheriff will mail the tenant a 24 hour notice the day before the planned eviction to give them one last chance to leave on his/her own. This notice is not legally required and so it is irrelevant if the Sheriff does not do it for every eviction. Think of it as a courtesy.

If the tenant still has personal property in the rental unit when the Sheriff arrives to execute the writ ,the Sheriff will then determine what of the tenant's personal property should be stored by the moving company and what property is considered to have no value and can be disposed of. After the tenant's personal property has been dealt with, and if the tenant is still residing in the property, the Sheriff will direct the tenant -- and any others residing in the unit -- out of the unit and insure that the unit is secure. If the tenant refuses to leave the unit, s/he will be arrested for Disorderly Conduct. It should be noted that the Sheriff can make the tenant leave the specific rental unit but cannot make the tenant leave the apartment building or complex. If the tenant refuses to leave the building then the landlord must call the police.

It is helpful if the landlord or his agent can be present during the eviction to answer any questions that the Sheriff or moving company may have. I have heard of one instance where a tenant told the Sheriff that the refirgerator and stove in the unit were purchased by the tenant and were his. This was not the truth. The landlord was not present during the eviction however to refute the tenant (or to produce the rental agreement to the Sheriff which would have shown that the landord supplied a refrigerator and stove along with the rental) and the appliances were taken off to storage. The landlord had a difficult time retrieving his property and had to pay a storage fee to get the appliances back.

In smaller counties -- those with a population of less than 500,000 -- a landlord is allowed to remove, store, and dispose of a tenant's property himself/herself and the only role that the Sheriff performs is to supervise the landlord. I have not had any experience with this type of eviction, so I can not provide yu with any more information other than this option is legally available to landlords who own rental property outside of Milwaukee County.

Next week I will blog on some of the smaller details involved with executing a writ that will assist you in the process.

Judge Siefert to Rotate Out of Small Claims Division in August; Judge Carroll to Replace

Walking into the courthouse today I ran into an acquaintance of mine who works within the court system. During our chat I learned that Judge John Siefert, who is currently presiding over the Small Claims Division (which includes all eviction actions) in Milwaukee County, will be rotating to a different calandar come August 1st.

Judge Jane Carroll will be replacing Judge Siefert as the Small Claims judge. Judge Carroll is currently presiding at Children's Court in Wauwatosa. She is a former District Attorney and has not previously been a judge in the Small Claims Division.