The Next Landlord Boot Camp Is Right Around The Corner on October 26, 2019

Autumn is just around the corner and that means Landlord Boot Camp is right around the corner.  This will be the 20th Boot Camp that I have taught for the AASEW and it will be held on Saturday, October 26, 2019.

To sign up now you can call or email Kathy at (414) 276-7378 or kathy@AASEW.org or sign up online at www.LandlordBootCamp2019.com

Below are more details about the event.

Thanks

T

The Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin's Landlord Boot Camp can help you navigate these treacherous waters and learn how to run your properties with less hassles.

WHO: Taught by Attorney Tristan R. Pettit of Petrie + Pettit S.C.

Attorney Tristan Pettit has given similar landlord-tenant law seminars to fellow attorneys, landlords, and property management organizations that charge their members $400-$500. This is your opportunity to learn all of the same information at a huge discount through the Apartment Association.

WHEN: October 26, 2019 from 8:30 am - 5 pm. Q+A from 5 pm - 6 pm

Registration opens at 7:10 AM. The seminar will run from 8:30 am to 5 pm with a half hour lunch break. There will be a one hour question and answer session afterwards, ending promptly at 6 pm. Many will find the Q&A invaluable, therefore you may wish to make arrangements to stay until 6 pm.

WHERE: Four Points by Sheraton at 5311 S. Howell Ave in Milwaukee.

INCLUDED:

• 100 plus page manual to help you put what you learn into practice.

• LUNCH

PRICE:

• AASEW Members $189

• Non-Members $329

Wisconsin landlord-tenant laws are constantly changing. To help keep you up to date those who attended in the past three years receive a $40 discount.

What you will learn at the AASEW's Fall 2019 Landlord Boot Camp:

Landlord Boot Camp covers everything that you need to know about residential Landlord Tenant law in Wisconsin, as amended in March 2012 by Act 143, in March 2014 and again in March 2016 with the passage of ACT 176, and again in April of 2018 with Act 317 including:

1. How to properly screen prospective tenants.

2. How to draft written screening criteria to assist you in the selection process.

3. How to comply with both federal and state Fair Housing laws including how to comply with “reasonable modifications" and “reasonable accommodations" requests.

4. How to legally reject an applicant.

5. What rental documents you should be using.

6. Best practices to avoid violating ATCP 134 and being sued by your tenant for double damages and actual attorney's fees.

7. How to properly draft a security deposit itemization letter.

8. How to avoid DATCP investigations and Civil Investigative Demands (CID's).

9. How to draft a good Notice for Breach so that it will not be defeated in court.

10. When you should use a 5 day notice, 14 day notice, 28 day notice.

11. The best way to serve a notice terminating tenancy.

12. Learn the "Ins and Outs" of the judicial eviction process.

13. How to prepare for your eviction trial in court.

14. Whether or not it is worth it to pursue a money judgment against your tenant.

15. Learn about the two types of garnishment action

How Long Should A Landlord Save A Tenant's Lease and Other Rental Documents?

A while ago I wrote a post in which I recommended that landlords retain a denied rental applicant's application and related paperwork for at least 2 years from the date of denial.  This post will focus on the situation where the landlord has accepted the applicant, the applicant was your tenant, and now their tenancy has ended for whatever reason.  Under this scenario, how long should a landlord hold on to a past-tenant's rental documents (which would include the lease or month to month rental agreement, nonstandard rental provisions document, pet addendum etc. etc.)?

The answer to this question again, just like in my prior post, depends on something called the "statute of limitation."  A statute of limitation is a law which sets the maximum period in which a person can wait before filing a complaint or lawsuit against another person.

By entering into a lease or a month to month rental agreement (or any other rental document for that matter) with a tenant, you have entered into a contract.  So, if a tenant refuses to take occupancy because the tenant feels that the apartment was not in a habitable condition as promised, the tenant could sue the landlord for a breach of contract.  If a landlord forgot to return a tenant's security deposit within the applicable time frame, the tenant could also sue a landlord for a breach of contract.  Most violations of a lease or other rental document would be considered a breach of contract.

The statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit based upon a breach of contract in Wisconsin is 6 years from the date of the breach.  So, the safest thing for a landlord to do is to keep a past-tenant's rental file, and specifically all the contracts, for at least 6 years from the date that the contract ended. 

When it comes to the return of a security deposit, a landlord has 21 days after a lease has ended (or any other action set forth in Wis. Stat. § 704.28(4)) to return the security deposit or send the letter itemizing how the security deposit was applied.  As such a landlord would be smart to retain the tenant's file and all contracts for at least 6 years after the deadline for the return of the tenant’s security deposit (i.e. 6 years + 21 days from any event sent forth is Wis. Stat. § 704.28(4)).

If you forget to keep your past-tenant's rental documents for at least 6 years, you could end up in the unenviable position of trying to defend yourself against a lawsuit filed by a past-tenant whose tenancy you have no memory of.  As such, you would have no documents to refer to, to refresh your memory nor would you have any documents that you could use as an exhibit in court.  Keep in mind that a tenant typically only has one landlord at a time, whereas you may have tens or hundreds of tenants simultaneously.  It is probably safe to say that the tenant will have a better memory of you and his or her tenancy than you will have of them.  Therefore, keeping all tenant-related documentation for as long as the past tenant can sue you, is very important.  With computers and the ability to save things digitally these days, a landlord has no excuse for not holding on to a tenant’s rental file for at least the length of the statute of limitations.

GUEST POST: Wisconsin Rental Income Standards and Section 8 Rent Vouchers

Guest post from Tim Ballering  - justalandlord.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From a Fair Housing perspective, you probably must account in some manner for the value of the Section 8 payment when calculating an income multiplier guideline.

I’ve read of the argument made in other jurisdictions that if an owner is using a rent multiplier, that it should be on net rent to the tenant. This is probably not a workable answer for either tenant nor the owner. If the net payment by the tenant is $20 with a three times multiplier, a $60 per month income is not going to cover living expenses like heat and lights. A good discussion of this issue from a while ago is at: Bigger Pockets

In WI you must include the value of child support, food stamps and perhaps* Rent Assistance Vouchers in income calculations. So if the gross rent is $800 and the tenant receives $700 RA, $500 in food stamps, they would need to earn $1200 additional to meet the three times multiplier.

*Wisconsin Lawful Source of Income definition:

Wis Admin Code DWD 220.02(8)  “Lawful source of income” includes, but is not limited to, lawful compensation or lawful remuneration in exchange for goods or services provided; profit from financial investments; any negotiable draft, coupon or voucher representing monetary value such as food stamps; social security; public assistance; unemployment compensation or worker’s compensation payments.

There is a 1995 federal case, Knapp v. Eagle Property Management Corp, that found the value of Section 8 vouchers are not required to be included as income.

But that was nearly 25 years ago. Sentiments have changed over that time. I believe that if Knapp was tried today the court would find against the owner on this question as concepts like disparate impact were not widely argued then. Today we are restricted by HUD in using criminal records in screening because of the disparate impact on members of protected classes.

The plain language reading of the WI code makes not including the voucher value in the rent multiplier calculation open to expensive litigation, which the Knapp court determined that their insurer had no duty to defend.

To form your own opinion on this and other WI fair housing standards, a good starting point is:

“STATE OF WISCONSIN Fair Housing Plan Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing and Actions to Overcome Them Update to the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan”

~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks Tim

A Few More Spots Are Left for Saturday's Landlord Boot Camp

Hi All -- We have a few more spots left for Saturday's Landlord Boot Camp.  Info is below.  Hope to see many of you there.  If you don't want to attend because of the wealth of information that you will receive as well as the great resource materials, then attend for the free lunch  ; )

T

I wanted to let everyone know that the next Landlord Boot Camp will be held on Saturday, February 9, 2019.

One new topic that I will discuss is Milwaukee County's new ordinance creating a new protected class for tenants with rental vouchers.  I will be explaining the new ordinance and what a landlord can and cannot do with regard to this new protected class.

I also will be discussing the new law changes under Act 317 which became effective as of April 18, 2018.  With so many changes in the law recently, this is definitely the Boot camp that you want to attend.  The 100+ page manual has also been updated as have many of the sample forms that are included. 

To sign up now you can call or email Kathy at (414) 276-7378 or kathy@AASEW.org or sign up online at www.LandlordBootCamp2019.com

Below are more details about the event.

The Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin's Landlord Boot Camp can help you navigate these treacherous waters and learn how to run your properties with less hassles.

WHO: Taught by Attorney Tristan R. Pettit of Petrie + Pettit S.C.

Attorney Tristan Pettit has given similar landlord-tenant law seminars to fellow attorneys, landlords, and property management organizations that charge their members $400-$500. This is your opportunity to learn all of the same information at a huge discount through the Apartment Association.

WHEN: February 9, 2019 from 8:30 am - 5 pm. Q+A from 5 pm - 6 pm

Registration opens at 7:10 AM. The seminar will run from 8:30 am to 5 pm with a half hour lunch break. There will be a one hour question and answer session afterwards, ending promptly at 6 pm. Many will find the Q&A invaluable, therefore you may wish to make arrangements to stay until 6 pm.

WHERE: Four Points by Sheraton at 5311 S. Howell Ave in Milwaukee.

INCLUDED:

• 100 plus page manual to help you put what you learn into practice.

• LUNCH

PRICE:

• AASEW Members $179

• Non-Members $297

SPECIALS: Not an AASEW member? Pay just $1 more than the non-member price ($298) and receive both attendance at Boot Camp and a 12 month general membership at the AASEW, which includes discounts at Home Depot, Sherwin Williams and more.

Wisconsin landlord-tenant laws are constantly changing. To help keep you up to date those who attended in the past three years receive a $40 discount.

What you will learn at the AASEW's Spring 2019 Landlord Boot Camp:

Landlord Boot Camp covers everything that you need to know about residential Landlord Tenant law in Wisconsin, as amended in March 2012 by Act 143, in March 2014 and again in March 2016 with the passage of ACT 176, and again in April of 2018 with Act 317 including:

1. How to properly screen prospective tenants

2. How to draft written screening criteria to assist you in the selection process

3. How to comply with both federal

Part 2: Landlords Can Be Liable for the Discriminatory Acts of Their Tenants

I received an email from a reader regarding my last post about the Wetzel case.  The reader essentially asked me what a landlord could do to make sure that they do not become liable for the discriminatory acts of their tenants like what happened to the landlord in the Wetzel case.

While I cannot give legal advice (i.e. applying the law to a certain set of facts) via this blog, I can certainly provide general guidelines, so here goes:

1. Don't do anything that the landlord in Wetzel did.  Read the facts of the case - they are egregious.  Do the exact opposite of what the landlord did.
2. If a tenant complains of abuse or harassment by other tenants, investigate the complaints to see if they are valid.  Wetzel advised the landlord that she was called a "fucking faggot" and "homosexual bitch" by other tenants.  Wetzel complained to the landlord that a tenant threatened to "rip her tits off."  Another tenant reveled in his memory of the Orlando massacre at the Pulse nightclub and Wetzel reported this to the landlord.  Wetzel was hit in the back of her head while alone in the mail room sitting on her scooter which resulted in her being knocked from her scooter.  Following the hit on the head, tenants taunted Wetzel openly by rubbing their heads and saying "ouch" when they passed her.  Another tenant spat on Wetzel while in the elevator.  Another tenant hit Wetzel's scooter with his walker. It was alleged that Wetzel reported all of this to the landlord and that the landlord did not do anything to investigate the incidents or protect her.  Instead the landlord chalked everything up to the ordinary squabbling and bickering that occurs among tenants residing in a facility for seniors.
   
3. If your tenant is being harassed or abused by other tenants do not call him or her a liar.  
4. Do not dismiss abusive conduct as accidental if your investigation proves otherwise.  
5. Do not deny a tenant's allegations of abuse and call her a liar.
6. Don't restrict the tenant that is allegedly being abused from accessing portions of the rental property.  The landlord in Wetzel told her that she could no longer eat in the main dinging room and barred her from using the lobby area except to get coffee.  The landlord also stopped providing Wetzel with cleaning service to which she was entitled under her lease. 
7. If a tenant complains of being abused by another tenant, do not retaliate against her for making the complaint, by starting the process to evict him/her.
8. Don't physically hit a tenant.  It was alleged that two of the landlord's employees woke Wetzel up from sleeping in the early morning hours, accused her of smoking in her room, and then one of the employees slapped her across the face.
9. If after your investigation, you believe the allegations occurred - respond appropriately as allowed under landlord-tenant law.  The landlord in Wetzel had the ability to contact the police to report what was going on.  The landlord also could have served the abusive tenant/s with the proper notice (5 day, 14 day, 28 day, or 30 day) depending on the situation.  
10. If the abusive tenants behavior has not been corrected then proceed to evict them, if necessary.

It is quite clear that if the landlord in this case had made any attempt, no matter how little, to protect Wetzel from the abuse that the Court's holding would have not been as far-reaching.  In fact, the Court even wrote in their opinion that "had the management done nothing but listen [to Wetzel] we might have a more limited case."

I hope that this answers your question.

Landlords Can Be Liable for the Discriminatory Acts of Their Tenants

Perhaps one of the most important cases to be published in 2018 affecting landlord-tenant law was the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case of Wetzel v. Glen St. Andrew Living Community, LLC, 2018 WI 4057365 (7^th Cir. Aug 27, 2018).  In the Wetzelcase the Seventh Circuit (which includes Wisconsin) held that a landlord may be liable under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) for failing to protect a tenant from known, discriminatory harassment by other tenants.

Within months of arriving at Glen St. Andrew, Wetzel, who was a lesbian, was physically and verbally abused by other tenants. On multiple occasions Wetzel asked staff members to intervene and protect her.  Rather than doing that, staff actually appeared to punish Wetzel by limiting where she was allowed to go in the facility.

Glen St. Andrews own Rules and Regulations document allowed it to evict any tenant who “engages in acts or omissions that constitute a direct threat to the health and safety of other individuals.”  Rather than enforce its rules against the tenants harassing Wetzel, staff told her not to worry about the harassment, dismissed the abuse as accidental, and denied Wetzel’s version of the facts, and even called her a liar.

The Court wrote that had the landlord done nothing but merely listen to the tenant, that its holding might have been more limited, however in this case Glen St. Andrew took affirmative steps to retaliate against Wetzel for complaining.

The Wetzel court interpreted the FHA broadly and ruled that not only does the FHA create liability for a landlord who intentionally discriminates against a tenant based on their protected class status; the FHA also creates liability against a landlord that has actual notice of tenant-on-tenant harassment based on the tenant's membership in a protected class, yet chooses not to take any reasonable steps within its control to stop the harassment.

While the landlord's actions in Wetzel were pretty egregious and faced with a different set of facts the Court may have held differently, the key takeaway from this case is that if landlords fail to curtail discriminatory conduct by tenants on other tenants, when it is possible for for the landlord to do so, the landlord may end up having direct liability under the FHA.

The Next Landlord Boot Camp Will Be Held on Feb. 9, 2019

Happy New Year Everyone - 

I hope that everyone had an enjoyable and safe holiday season.

I wanted to let everyone know that the next Landlord Boot Camp will be held on Saturday, February 9, 2019.

One new topic that I will discuss is Milwaukee County's new ordinance creating a new protected class for tenants with rental vouchers.  I will be explaining the new ordinance and what a landlord can and cannot do with regard to this new protected class.

I also will be discussing the new law changes under Act 317 which became effective as of April 18, 2018.  With so many changes in the law recently, this is definitely the Boot camp that you want to attend.  The 100+ page manual has also been updated as have many of the sample forms that are included. 

To sign up now you can call or email Kathy at (414) 276-7378 or kathy@AASEW.org or sign up online at www.LandlordBootCamp2019.com

Below are more details about the event.

Thanks

T

The Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin's Landlord Boot Camp can help you navigate these treacherous waters and learn how to run your properties with less hassles.

WHO: Taught by Attorney Tristan R. Pettit of Petrie + Pettit S.C.

Attorney Tristan Pettit has given similar landlord-tenant law seminars to fellow attorneys, landlords, and property management organizations that charge their members $400-$500. This is your opportunity to learn all of the same information at a huge discount through the Apartment Association.

WHEN: February 9, 2019 from 8:30 am - 5 pm. Q+A from 5 pm - 6 pm

Registration opens at 7:10 AM. The seminar will run from 8:30 am to 5 pm with a half hour lunch break. There will be a one hour question and answer session afterwards, ending promptly at 6 pm. Many will find the Q&A invaluable, therefore you may wish to make arrangements to stay until 6 pm.

WHERE: Four Points by Sheraton at 5311 S. Howell Ave in Milwaukee.

INCLUDED:

• 100 plus page manual to help you put what you learn into practice.

• LUNCH

PRICE:

• AASEW Members $179

• Non-Members $297

SPECIALS: Not an AASEW member? Pay just $1 more than the non-member price ($298) and receive both attendance at Boot Camp and a 12 month general membership at the AASEW, which includes discounts at Home Depot, Sherwin Williams and more.

Wisconsin landlord-tenant laws are constantly changing. To help keep you up to date those who attended in the past three years receive a $40 discount.

What you will learn at the AASEW's Spring 2019 Landlord Boot Camp:

Landlord Boot Camp covers everything that you need to know about residential Landlord Tenant law in Wisconsin, as amended in March 2012 by Act 143, in March 2014 and again in March 2016 with the passage of ACT 176, and again in April of 2018 with Act 317 including:

1. How to properly screen prospective tenants

2. How to draft written screening criteria to assist you in the selection process

3. How to comply with both federal and state Fair Housing laws including how to comply with “reasonable modifications" and “reasonable accommodations" requests

4. How to legally reject an applicant

5. What rental documents you should be using<

How Long Should You Retain A Denied Rental Application?

I am often asked by landlords and rental property managers how long they should hold on to the rental applications of applicants that were denied.  

The answer to that question depends on something called the "statute of limitations."  A statute of limitation is a law which sets the maximum period of time in which a person can wait before filing a claim/complaint or lawsuit against another person.

The statute of limitations for a rental applicant to file a federal fair housing (discrimination) complaint against a landlord for failing to accept his/her application is 2 years.  The statute of limitations for a state fair housing (discrimination) claim to be filed is shorter -- only 1 year. 

So what this means to you is that you MUST retain all rental applications and any other related documentation, such as credit reports, criminal reports, questionnaires sent to current or prior landlords, CCAP printouts showing past evictions etc. etc., for at least 2 years from your last interaction with an applicant that did not become your tenant.  You will also want to save for the same period of time, the specific written screening criteria that you were using at the time that you processed and rejected the application.

If you fail to do this then you may end up in the unenviable position of trying to defend yourself against a fair housing (discrimination) claim brought by a disgruntled applicant that you have no memory of and you will not have any documentation that you can refer to in order to defend yourself.  While there is a strong likelihood that you will not remember each and every rental applicant that you have interacted with in the last 2 years, it is important to note that a denied applicant will always remember you because in their mind you are the person that denied them housing for discriminatory reasons.

You never, ever want to be stuck in a  "He Said, She Said" situation.  A "He Said, She Said" scenario is one where the denied applicant is saying that you denied their application for reasons in violation of the Fair Housing laws and all you can say in reply is "No, that is not true" but you have nothing but your word to refute the allegations.  Landlords and Property Managers always want to be in a position where they can produce written evidence to support their non-discriminatory reasons for denying an application.  And that can only be done if you retain all denied rental applications, written communications, and other relevant documents related to your decision, until the statute of limitations has run. 

Less Than One Month Until AASEW's Landlord Boot Camp on October 20, 2018.

Hello Everyone –

There is less than 1 month left until the next Landlord Boot Camp which is scheduled for October 20, 2018.

One new topic that I will discuss is Milwaukee County's new ordinance creating a new protected class for tenants with rental vouchers.  I will be explaining the new ordinance and what a landlord can and cannot do with regard to this new protected class.

I also will be discussing the new law changes under Act 317 which became effective as of April 18, 2018.  With so many changes in the law recently, this is definitely the Boot camp that you want to attend.  The 100+ page manual has also been updated as have many of the sample forms that are included. 

To sign up now you can call or email Kathy at (414) 276-7378 or kathy@AASEW.org or sign up online at www.LandlordBootCamp2018.com

Below are more details about the event.

Thanks

T

The Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin's Landlord Boot Camp can help you navigate these treacherous waters and learn how to run your properties with less hassles.

WHO: Taught by Attorney Tristan R. Pettit of Petrie + Pettit S.C.

Attorney Tristan Pettit has given similar landlord-tenant law seminars to fellow attorneys, landlords, and property management organizations that charge their members $400-$500. This is your opportunity to learn all of the same information at a huge discount through the Apartment Association.

WHEN: October 20, 2018 from 8:30 am - 5 pm. Q+A from 5 pm - 6 pm

Registration opens at 7:10 AM. The seminar will run from 8:30 am to 5 pm with a half hour lunch break. There will be a one hour question and answer session afterwards, ending promptly at 6 pm. Many will find the Q&A invaluable, therefore you may wish to make arrangements to stay until 6 pm.

WHERE: Four Points by Sheraton at 5311 S. Howell Ave in Milwaukee.

INCLUDED:

• 100 plus page manual to help you put what you learn into practice.

• LUNCH

PRICE:

• AASEW Members $179

• Non-Members $297

SPECIALS: Not an AASEW member? Pay just $1 more than the non-member price ($298) and receive both attendance at Boot Camp and a 12 month general membership at the AASEW, which includes discounts at Home Depot, Sherwin Williams and more.

Wisconsin landlord-tenant laws are constantly changing. To help keep you up to date those who attended in the past three years receive a $40 discount.

What you will learn at the Apartment Association's Fall 2018 Landlord Boot Camp:

Landlord Boot Camp covers everything that you need to know about residential Landlord Tenant law in Wisconsin, as amended in March 2012 by Act 143, in March 2014 and again in March 2016 with the passage of ACT 176, and again in April of 2018 with Act 317 including:

1. How to properly screen prospective tenants

2. How to draft written screening criteria to assist you in the selection process

3. How to comply with both federal and state Fair Housing laws including how to comply with “reasonable modifications" and “reasonable accommodations" requests

4. How to legally reject an applicant

5. What rental documents you should be using and why

AND MUCH MORE

Milwaukee County Passes Ordinance Making "Receipt of Rental or Housing Assistance" A Protected Class

On June 21, 2018 the Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors passed a county ordinance amending Chapter 107 of the County Code of Ordinances (which deals with Fair Housing) adding "receipt of rental or housing assistance" as a protected class.  The ordinance went into effect as of July 19, 2018.  The Milwaukee County's Office of Corporation Counsel shall be responsible for enforcement. 

The revised ordinance defines "receipt of rental or housing assistance" as follows:

"Receipt of rental housing assistance" means the receipt of any form of financial contribution from a third party for the purposes of creating or keeping affordable housing for tenants, purchasers, or other potential housing recipients, including but not limited to, assistance provided pursuant to Title 42, United Housing Code, section 1437f (commonly known as the "Section 8" housing program), the HOME Partnership Program, the Community Development Block Grant program, or any other public rental assistance vouchers or programs.  It shall not be considered unlawful discrimination in housing for a housing provider to (1) refuse to accept emergency assistance funds under s. 49.138, Wis. Stats., or (2) refuse to accept any other public rental assistance or voucher if such rental assistance or voucher does not fully reimburse the housing provider for the amount of rent due at the time a rental assistance or voucher payment is made. 

What this means to landlords and property managers operating in Milwaukee County is that you can no longer advertise that you do not accept "Rent Assistance" or "Section 8" tenants.  It also means that when prospective tenants call you and ask if you accept "Section 8" that you cannot say "no."

What this does not mean however is that you are required to accept any and all tenants receiving rental or housing assistance.  You can still utilize your written screening criteria and if the applicant does not meet your requirements, they can still be denied even though they receive housing assistance.  But your screening criteria can no longer have the receipt of housing assistance as a basis for denial.

This also does not mean that you are now required to enter into a contract with a municipality or its agent, often referred to as a Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract, if you do not agree with the terms and conditions of that contract.  A landlord or property management company cannot be forced to enter into a contract that the landlord does not want to be a part of.  Many landlords who are otherwise in support of this ordinance and its intent are not in favor of the terms and requirements of the HAP contract.  Landlords that disagree with the terms of the HAP contract can still refuse to sign it.  In my prior blog post on this issue, I list several of the issues/concerns that some have with the HAP contract. Being part of some of the discussions with the County on the concerns with the HAP contract, I am aware that the County is aware of our concerns with the contract and its representatives have indicated that plan to look into some of these issues.

We will have to wait and see how this all plays out.  I will be discussing this issue more in depth, along with many other important landord-tenant law topics, at my next Landlord Boot Camp on October 20, 2018.

You can read the ordinance here.

Happy Landlording.

VIDEO: Interview Summarizing Key Points of Wisconsin's Latest Landlord-Tenant Law - Act 317

I recently had the opportunity to present a continuing legal education (CLE) webinar for the State Bar of Wisconsin on the recent passage of Act 317 - Wisconsin's latest Landlord-Tenant law changes.  After the webinar, which is primarily for attorneys, I was interviewed by the State Bar about some of the highlights from Act 317 and they were nice enough to allow me to include the video on by blog

New and Improved Residential Rental Agreement Form Available Now

As many of you know, there was a large Landlord-Tenant law that was enacted last month. If you were not aware of this you should take a look at my earlier post on Act 317. As a result of that new law, it was necessary for me to add a new section to the Residential Rental Agreement forms (Forms 19 and 19L) that I draft and which are sold at Wisconsin Legal Blank Company, Inc.

I also took the opportunity to make some other additions/revisions to improve the Rental Agreement form. You know how it goes, once something is completed, rather it be a newly remodeled house, a tweak to your golf swing, or as in this case, a residential rental agreement form, you automatically start wanting to do something more to it. Anyhow, I have been keeping a list of changes that I wanted to make to the Rental Agreement ever since it was printed back in August of 2016.

Below is a summary of the changes to the new and improved Residential Rental Agreement form:

1. Electronic Delivery of Certain Information/Documentation

I added a new section entitled “Electronic Delivery of Certain Information/Documentation" which summarized the new law that allows a Landlord to send certain information and documents to a Tenant via electronic means as long as the parties have agreed to this in writing. Please note that in order for this portion of the new law to apply, a landlord will have to enter into a new rental agreement or renewal that includes such language after April 18, 2018, which is when Act 317 became effective.

2. Short-Term and Vacation Rentals Prohibited

With the significant rise of tenants everywhere subletting their rentals, or portions of their rentals, via online websites like Airbnb, Homeaway, and VRBO, it became necessary to add to the form's section entitled “Assignment or Sublease" clarifying that short-term or vacation rentals are indeed a subletting and are not allowed.

3. End of Lease Term will be 12 noon.

I added a section that specifies that a lease for term will terminate at 12 noon on the final day of the term thus allowing, Landlords a bit more time to turn the unit over.

4. Additional Occupants Under Age 18 Residing on the Premises

I added a new section that allows a Landlord to list underage occupants residing in the premises. This was especially needed because if you were using the digital version of the Rental Agreement form and you included a child's name in the “Tenant" section, it would automatically create a signature line for the child. Oops.

5. No Mounting of Flat Screen Televisions or Satellite Dishes

Under the section entitled “Modifications To Premises" I added a prohibition against the mounting of flat screen televisions to walls and satellite dishes to shared portions of the premises, unless previously authorized by Landlord.

6. Payment for Damage

I added a new section entitled “Payment for Damage" that indicates that if Tenant-caused damage is repaired by Landlord that Tenant must reimburse Landlord for the costs within 10 days of demand,

7. Clarification of Overnight Guest Provision

The language used in the “Use of Premises and Guests" section of the Rental Agreement relating to how long a guest could reside in the rental unit needed to be clarified as it was vague and unclear. Language was added to explain that a guest may not reside in the rental unit for more than 14 non-consecutive days within any one year period or for more than 3 consecutive days within any one month period, without the prior written permission of Landlord.

8. Damage By Casualty

I completely re-wrote the “Damage by Casualty" section of the rental agreement in light of huge uptick in floods and fires that I have seen recently.. I felt that the prior language was not sufficiently clear to allow a Landlord all of the options available to him/her if the rental premises became untenatable due to casualty.

9. No Third-Party Checks Allowed and Ability to Require Future Payments Be Made By Certified Funds

I added language to the “Rent" section of the rental agreement form stating that unless otherwise agreed to by Landlord, all rental payments must be made from Tenant or Co-signer's account and that third-party checks will not be accepted. I also added language explaining that if a Tenant's rent payments is returned due to insufficient funds or for any other reason that a Landlord may require that future rent be paid by certified funds.

It is my hope that these changes will make the Residential Rental Agreement form more up-to date and beneficial to those of you using it. If you are interested in purchasing the new and improved Rental Agreement please contact Wisconsin Legal Blank Co., Inc. at (414) 344-5155, wilegalblank.com or in person at 749 N. 37^th Street in Milwaukee

Take Care

T

New Landlord-Tenant Law - Act 317 - Is Effective on April 18, 2018.

On April 16, 2018 Governor Walker signed into law 2017 Wisconsin Act 317 which is Wisconsin's newest Landlord-Tenant law. The law was published yesterday, April 17th, which means that it will become effective tomorrow, April 18, 2018.

It is a very large law -- 8 1/2 pages long -- too much for me to cover in this post. I have chosen to focus on the portions of the law that affect Landlord-Tenant law specifically. There are other portions of the law that will affect Landlording in general, however, so I recommend that you review the entire law.

ASSISTANCE ANIMALS

• Repeals Wis. Stat. § 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.
• Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. Both sections provide guidance on the law regarding assistance animals.

Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Individuals with Disabilities (“Animal")

• If a rental applicant/tenant (“Tenant") has a disability and a disability-related need for an Animal, it is discrimination for a Landlord to do any of the following because the Tenant keeps such an Animal:

1. Refuse to rent;
2. Cause the eviction of;
3. Require extra compensation from the Tenant as a condition of continued residence; or
4. Engage in the harassment of the Tenant.

• If a Tenant wants to keep an Animal, the Landlord may request -- unless the disability and the disability-related need is apparent or known -- that the Tenant provide:

1. Reliable documentation that the Tenant has a disability; and
2. Reliable documentation of the disability-related need for the Animal.

• A Tenant who keeps an Animal shall accept liability for damage to the premises caused by the Animal.
• A Landlord can deny a Tenant the ability to keep an Animal if:

1. The Tenant is not disabled, does not have a disability-related need for the Animal, or fails to provide the necessary documentation;
2. Allowing the Animal would impose an undue financial and administrative burden or would fundamentally alter the nature of services provided by the Landlord;
3. The specific Animal poses a direct threat to a person's health or safety that cannot be reduced or eliminated by another reasonable accommodation;
4. The specific Animal would cause substantial physical damage to a person's property that cannot be reduced or eliminated by another reasonable accommodation.

Emotional Support Animals (“ESA")

• An ESA is defined as an animal that provides emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship to an individual but is not trained to perform tasks for the benefit of a disabled person.
• If a rental applicant/tenant (“Tenant") has a disability and a disability-related need for an ESA, it is discrimination for a Landlord to do any of the following because the Tenant keeps an ESA:

1. Refuse to rent;
2. Cause the eviction of;
3. Require extra compensation from the Tenant as a condition of continued residence; or
4. Engage in the harassment of the Tenant.

• If a Tenant wants to keep an ESA, the Landlord may request -- unless the disability and the disability-related need is apparent or known -- that the Tenant provide:

1. Reliable documentation that the Tenant has a disability; and
2. Reliable documentation of the disability-related need for the ESA from a licensed health care professional.

NOTE: A “licensed health care professional" is defined as a physician, psychologist, social worker, or other health care professional who satisfies all of the following:

1. Licensed or certified in the state of Wisconsin; and
2. Acting within the scope of his or her license or certification.

• A Tenant who keeps an ESA shall accept liability for damage to the premises caused by the ESA.
• A Landlord can deny a Tenant the ability to keep an ESA if:

1. The Tenant is not disabled, does not have a disability-related need for the ESA, or fails to provide the necessary documentation;
2. Allowing the ESA would impose an undue financial and administrative burden or would fundamentally alter the nature of services provided by the Landlord;
3. The specific ESA poses a direct threat to a person's health or safety that cannot be reduced or eliminated by another reasonable accommodation;
4. The specific ESA would cause substantial physical damage to a person's property that cannot be reduced or eliminated by another reasonable accommodation.

• If a Tenant, for the purpose of obtaining housing, intentionally misrepresents that s/he has a disability or misrepresents the need for an ESA to assist with the disability, the Tenant shall pay a fine of not less than $500.
• If a licensed health care professional, for the purpose of allowing a patient to obtain housing, misrepresents that the patient has a disability or a disability-related need for an ESA, the health care provider shall pay a fine of not less than $500.

CHARGING FOR LANDLORD'S TIME AND MATERIALS

• Current law states that if Landlord elects to repair the damage caused by the Tenant then the Tenant must reimburse the Landlord for the reasonable cost.
• The new law defines what “Reasonable Costs" include the following:

1. Materials or labor provided by Landlord;
2. At a reasonable hourly rate, the time a Landlord spends doing the following: (a) purchasing or providing materials, (b) supervising an agent of the Landlord, and/or (c) hiring a third-party contractor.

ABATEMENT

• Current law states that if the rental property in untentable and the Tenant remains in the property that rent can be abated.
• New law adds that the Tenant can only abate rent if s/he remains in the property and “the condition materially affects the health or safety of the tenant or substantially affects the use and occupancy of the premises.

CREDIT AND BACKGROUND CHECKS

• Essentially incorporates Wis. Admin, Code § ATCP 134.05(4) regarding credit checks and increases the amount that can be charged by $5 and adds a new provision regarding charging out of state applicants for background checks.
• A Landlord may require a rental applicant to pay the Landlord's actual cost, up to $25, to obtain a consumer credit report on the applicant from a consumer credit reporting agency that compiles and maintains files on a nationwide basis.
• A Landlord must notify the applicant of the charge prior to ordering the report and must provide a copy of the report to the applicant if applicant paid for the report.
• A Landlord cannot require an applicant to pay for the report is the applicant provides a copy of his/her credit report that is less than 30 days old, to the Landlord prior to the Landlord ordering the report.
• A Landlord may require an applicant who is not a resident of Wisconsin to pay the Landlord's actual costs, up to $25, to obtain a background check.
• A Landlord must notify the applicant of the charge prior to ordering the report and must provide a copy to the applicant.
• NOTE: This portion of Act 317 first applies to rental agreements entered into or renewed as of the effective date of the new law which is April 18, 2018.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS/INFORMATION

• A rental agreement may include provisions that allow a Landlord to provide and indicate agreement to send the following via electronic means:

1. A copy of the rental agreement and any document related to the rental agreement;
2. A security deposit and any documents related to the accounting and disposition of the security deposit and security deposit refund;
3. Any promise made by the Landlord, prior to entering into the rental agreement to clean, repair, or otherwise improve any portion of the rental unit;
4. A notice for Landlord to enter the rental unit.
• NOTE: This portion of Act 317 first applies to rental agreements entered into or renewed as of the effective date of the new law which is April 18, 2018.

RENT INCLUDES LATE FEES

• In the section regarding Notices Terminating Tenancy (Wis. Stat. § 704.17) the term “rent" is defined to include any rent that is past due as well as any late fees owed for rent that is past due.
• NOTE: This portion of Act 317 first applies to rental agreements entered into or renewed as of the effective date of the new law which is April 18, 2018.

INCORRECT AMOUNT IN NOTICE

• A notice for failure to pay rent or any other amount due under the rental agreement that includes an incorrect statement of the amount due is still valid unless any of the following apply:

1. The Landlord's statement of the amount due is intentionally incorrect; or
2. The Tenant paid or tendered payment of the amount that the Tenant believes to be due.
• NOTE: This portion of Act 317 first applies to rental agreements entered into or renewed as of the effective date of the new law which is April 18, 2018.

CONSOLIDATED COURT AUTOMATION PROGRAMS (CCAP)

• The Director of State Courts may not remove case management information from CCAP for any civil case that is not closed, confidential, or sealed for the following periods:

1. If a writ of restitution has been granted in an eviction action - 10 years;
2. If an eviction action has been dismissed and no money judgment has been docketed – 2 years.

NOTARIZATION

• A Court may not require that a person filing a summons or complaint under ch. 799 to have the summons and complaint notarized.

CONTESTED EVICTION

• Prior law stated that in an eviction, garnishment, or replevin action if any party claims that a contest exists, the matter shall be scheduled for a hearing before the judge.
• New law states that in an eviction, garnishment, or replevin action, if any party raises valid legal grounds for a contest, the matter shall be scheduled for a hearing before the judge.

SERVICE OF NOTICES

• If a Landlord gives a notice terminating tenancy via certified mail, proof of certified mailing from the U.S. Post Office is sufficient to establish that proper service has been provided. An affidavit of Service may not be requested to establish proper service has been provided.

WAIVER

• It shall not be a defense to an eviction action or a claim for damages that the Landlord or Tenant has previously waived any violation or breach of any terms of the rental agreement, including, but not limited to, the acceptance of rent or that a custom or practice occurred or developed between the parties in connection with the rental agreement so as to waive or lesson the right of the Landlord or Tenant to insist upon strict performance of the terms of the rental agreement.

EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE (“EA")

• Prior law said that the Court shall stay an eviction if the Tenant applies for EA.
• In McQuestion v. Crawford, 2009 WI App. 35, 316 Wis.2d. 494, 765 N.W.2d 822, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that any EA stay may be in effect for only a “reasonable period of time."
• New law requires that:

1. No EA stay may be granted after a writ of restitution has already been issued; and
2. If a stay is granted the stay may not be for more than 10 working days.

REPRESENTATIONS TO COURT AS TO PREPARATION OF PLEADINGS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS

• If an attorney drafts or assists in drafting a pleading, motion, or other document for a self-represented person. Any such document must contain a statement immediately adjacent to the person's signature that “This document was prepared with the assistance of a lawyer, followed by the name of the attorney and the attorney's state bar number."

GUEST POST: A Brief Overview of Wisconsin Options To Purchase

By Attorney David J. Espin of Petrie + Pettit S.C.

Many landlords in Wisconsin are looking for ways to persuade their tenants to put some “skin in the game," and eventually to purchase the property they are renting. Tenants with a financial stake in the property will often take better care of the premises, and are less likely to walk away from their lease obligations. In order to accomplish this, landlords often turn to land contracts so that tenants will build equity in the property, or rent credit programs structured to incentive tenants to save towards a down payment.

Unfortunately, these alternatives come with formidable downsides. In the event of a breach of the land contract, the property owner must go through a costly and time-consuming foreclosure process before it can proceed with an eviction. Rent credit programs risk garnering the attention of regulators who may interpret them as mortgage financing instruments in disguise, which, without the proper licenses, could result in significant fines and penalties. However, there is another alternative: the Option to Purchase.

Landlords can structure an Option to Purchase as part of the lease, or as a separate stand-alone agreement. Although there are many variations, an ordinary Option to Purchase usually contains the following key provisions:

• Tenant agrees to pay an upfront fee, usually called an “option fee," for the exclusive right to purchase the property pursuant to the terms of the agreement.
• Landlord and tenant agree upon the purchase price for the property. This can either be a fixed dollar amount, or some other methodology, such as an appraisal, used to determine the property's value if and when the option is exercised.
• For some finite period of time, the tenant has the exclusive right to purchase the property at the agreed upon purchase price.
• If the tenant lease breaches the lease, the Option to Purchase is voided.
• Regardless of whether the tenant exercises the Option to Purchase, the landlord retains the option fee. The consideration for the option fee is the tenant's exclusive right to purchase the property, and the landlord's agreement to keep the property off the market for the duration of the option.

If drafted and structured properly, the Option to Purchase can be a great way for landlords to take in some extra cash at the front end of the lease, give their tenants an incentive to maintain the property and abide by the terms of the lease, and potentially sell the property once the lease expires

Milwaukee County Proposes A New Protected Class in Housing - "Receipt of Rental or Housing Assistance"

Milwaukee County Supervisor Maria Dimitrijevec is sponsoring a resolution to amend the Milwaukee County Code of General Ordinances related to Fair Housing to include a new protected class - the "receipt of rental or housing assistance." The resolution has been referred to the Economic Development Committee and may be scheduled to be discussed at the committee's meeting on March 12, 2018 at 9 AM.

If passed, this resolution would have a significant impact on landlords and property managers. Currently a landlord may legally refuse to accept any applicant if they receive rental or housing assistance. If this resolution passes, landlords in Milwaukee County would no longer be able to do so without risking a discrimination claim.

Under the proposed resolution, "receipt of rental or housing assistance" is defined as including the receipt of any form of financial contribution from a third party for the purposes of creating or keeping affordable housing for tenants, purchasers, or other potential housing recipients, including but not limited to, assistance provided pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, section 1437f (commonly known as the "Section 8" housing program), the HOME Partnership Program, the Community Development Block Grant program, or any other public or private rental assistance vouchers or programs.

Rental or housing assistance in SE Wisconsin is often referred to as "Section 8" or "Rent Assistance" or "RA." The most common form of rental assistance is run through the Section 8 program. Section 8 tenant-based housing assistance is available to low-income families and the subsidy moves with the tenant and can be used to pay toward rent at any conventional market-rate rental units. Essentially the tenant chooses the rental unit where they want to live and if the tenant meets the landlord's screening criteria, the landlord accepts the RA (which will be required in Milwaukee County if this resolution passes), and the rental unit passes an inspection, then the Section 8 program will pay the RA directly to the landlord. The RA typically does not cover the entire monthly rent amount and therefore the tenant will be required to pay the difference to the landlord.

In order for a tenant to receive RA they need to find a landlord that will accept it. In order for a landlord to receive RA on behalf of a tenant the landlord must enter into a contract with the government or its agent. Here is an example of such a contract.

Some things to be aware of when entering into a contract to receive RA include:

1. The government or its agent determines what the maximum amount of rent that can be charged by the landlord for the rental property based on a number of factors. Once that maximum amount is determined, a landlord is prohibited from charging the tenant a higher amount.

2. The government or its agent will inspect the rental unit and it must pass certain housing quality standards and be maintained up to those standards throughout the lease term. If repairs are required to pass the inspection the landlord must pay for them and the landlord may also be cited for building code violations. At a minimum there will be annual inspections. If the standards are not met the government may withhold paying the RA to the landlord.

3. A landlord would not be able to use a month-to-month rental agreement with the tenant as all of the agencies that administer RA require the landlord to enter into an initial 12 month lease.

4. The government does not "screen" the tenant for the landlord - screening remains the landlord's responsibility.

5. The tenant cannot be evicted if the government fails to pay its portion of the monthly rent.

6. The landlord must serve the government with copies of any notice for failure to pay rent or other breach that the landlord serves on the tenant. If this is not done, it can serve as a basis for any ensuing eviction to be dismissed.

7. The government has no liability or responsibility to the landlord for the tenant's behavior (again, the government is not screening the tenant for you).

8. A landlord's lease must be approved by the government. A landlord's lease will be required to include the government's tenancy addendum and ideally the lease term (between the landlord's lease and the government's addendum) will be identical (but if it is not, the government's lease addendum controls).

Accepting RA is not for every landlord. For every landlord that loves the program I have heard just as many landlords that dislike it. Regardless of your view, you must be prepared to give up some control to the government in exchange for receiving the guaranteed RA from the government. There has been a trend around the country of municipalities adding "rental assistance" to the list of protected classes, so I am not surprised to see Milwaukee County joining in.

Don't Miss The Next Landlord Boot Camp on February 24th

Don't hand your keys over to just anyone . . . Join Attorney Tristan Pettit as he presents the AASEW's Landlord Boot Camp on February 24, 2018. Tristan will provide you with the information that you need to succeed as a landlord and/or property manager in the rental business. You will learn invaluable information to run your business more efficiently, avoid pitfalls that can crush your profit, and navigate the ever-changing landlord-tenant laws. The price of admission includes a 100+ page manual and lunch. For more information or to register click here. Tristan is a shareholder with the firm of Petrie + Pettit S.C. in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He concentrates his practice in the area of landlord-tenant law, representing landlords and property management companies throughout the state. Tristan drafts many of the landlord-tenant law forms sold at Wisconsin Legal Blank and is the past president, and currently on the board of directors, of the Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin.

New Landlord-Tenant Law Legislation - Wisconsin's Affordable Rental Housing Act of 2017

There are currently two bills in Madison that will significantly impact Landlord-Tenant Law in Wisconsin. 2017 Senate Bill 639 (SB 639) and 2017 Assembly Bill 771 (AB 771) ("bill") are referred to as the Wisconsin's Affordable Rental Housing Act of 2017 and are sponsored by Senator Frank Lasee and Representative Robert Brooks.

The 20-page bill address many issues including historic preservation, rental inspections, rental inspection fees, notice of eviction requirements, background and credit checks, emotional support animals, landlord's charging for personal time when making repairs, rent abatement, local fees, dwelling inspections, public utility service, levy limits, court records, municipal administrative review and the rental weatherization program.

It is important to understand that a bill is a work in progress. I attended a public hearing in Madison on SB 639 back on December 13th and based on the testimony presented at that hearing it is clear that there will be some modifications to the bill. Additionally the public hearing on the Assembly companion bill, AB 771, was only held earlier today. Additionally, in the past few days I have read several proposed changes to the bill, so there will definitely be some changes to the bill.

This blog post will only focus on the sections of the bill related to landlord-tenant law.

Emotional Support Animals

The bill will separate assistance animals animals into 2 separate categories. The first category will be "animals that do work or perform tasks for individuals with disabilities" and second category will be "emotional support animals." An emotional support animal ("ESA") is defined in the bill as an animal that provides emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship for an individual but that is not trained to perform tasks for the benefit of the person with a disability.

Under the bill a landlord is able to request that the individual who wants to keep an ESA submit reliable documentation from a licensed health professional verifying that the individual requesting the reasonable accommodation has both a disability and a disability-related need for the ESA. A "licensed health professional" is defined as a physician, psychologist, social worker, or other health professional who is licensed or certified in the state of Wisconsin and is acting within the scope of his or her license or certification.

A person that keeps an ESA shall accept liability for sanitation and damage to the premises caused by the ESA. Further the person requesting an ESA shall forfeit not less than $500 if he or she, for the purpose of obtaining housing or living in housing, misrepresents a disability or misrepresents the need for an ESA to assist with the disability. The bill also states that a licensed health professional that misrepresents the above for a person requesting an ESA will also be subject to the same forfeitures.

Landlords Are Able To Charge For Their Time

The bill clarifies that if a tenant causes damage to the rental property, a landlord is able to charge the tenant his/her "reasonable costs," at a reasonable hourly rate, which may include (a) the cost of materials and (b) the landlord's time spent purchasing materials, providing labor, supervising, or hiring a third-party contractor to make the repairs.

Abatement

A tenant can abate rent only if the tenant remains in possession of the rental property and the condition of the property materially affects the health or safety of the tenant or substantially affects the use and occupancy of the rental property. Further, any municipal ordinance that is currently in effect or is created in the future, may only allow abatement for conditions that materially affect the health or safety of a tenant or substantially affect the use and occupancy of the rental property.

Consumer Credit Reports and Background Checks

The bill allows a landlord to charge a rental applicant for the cost, up to $25, to purchase a consumer credit report or the actual cost to the landlord, whichever is less. This is a $5 increase from the current amount that can be charged. The bill also allows a landlord to charge a rental applicant that is not a resident of Wisconsin up to $25 to obtain a background check.

E-Delivery

A landlord will be allowed to provide the following information and/or documentation to a tenant by electric means: (1) rental documents, (2) security deposit documents related to the accounting and disposition of the security deposit or refund, (3) any promises made before the rental agreement was entered into relating to cleaning, repairing, or otherwise improving the rental property.

Rent Includes Late Fees

The bill would define rent to include any past due rent and accompanying late fees.

Incorrect Amount Listed In Notice

If a Notice for failure to pay rent or for failure to pay any other amount due under the rental agreement contains an incorrect dollar amount, the notice will still be valid unless the tenant has paid or tendered payment of money that the tenant admits is actually due. I expect to see some changes to this section as the purpose of this section of the bill was to prevent courts from dismissing evictions based on notices with mathematical errors but as written this section could be abused by some.

CCAP

The Director or State Courts may not remove any case management information from CCAP related to a civil case, which includes evictions, for a period of at least 10 years after the date that a final judgment was entered. I suspect this section will be modified before it becomes law.

Notarization

Eviction Summons will no longer need to be notarized.

Tenant Must Present Valid Legal Grounds To Contest An Eviciton

Currently in order to have an eviction action scheduled for a contested hearing a tenant merely has to "claim that a contest exists." Under the bill a tenant would be required to provide valid legal grounds to contest the eviction before he or she would be entitled to an eviction hearing.

Notices Terminating Tenancy

If a landlord serves a Notice via certified or registered mail and provides the court with a certified or registered mail receipt a court may not require the landlord to also complete and Affidavit of Service.

No Waiver

It shall not be a defense to an eviction lawsuit or a claim for damages that the landlord has previously waived any violation or breach of any of the terms of the rental agreement so as to waive or lesson the landlord's right to insist upon strict performance under the rental agreement in the future.

Emergency Assistance Stays

An Emergency Assistance stay cannot be ordered after the landlord has been granted a writ of restitution. If a writ has not yet been granted, the Court may only stay the eviction for no more than 5 working days. The time period of the stay in this section will most likely be enlarged due to testimony from the public hearing.

There are many other provisions in bill that I have not touched but which will affect landlords and property managers even though the sections are not lanldord-tenant related. f you are interested in reading the other provisions provisions which while they are not landlord-tenant related, will affect property owners and manager you should do so at SB 639 or AB 771.

T

Wondering What To Get That Special Landlord In Your Life For The Holidays?

Are you wondering what to get that special landlord in your life for the holidays? Look no further. How about giving him or her some peace of mind and lots of education? Send the landlord in your life to the AASEW's next Landlord Boot Camp on February 24, 2018.

Landlording can be pretty complex, with a seemingly never ending myriad of paperwork, rules, landlord-tenant laws and simple mistakes that can cost you thousands.

The Apartment Association of Southeastern Wisconsin's “Landlord Boot Camp" can help you navigate these treacherous waters and learn how to run your properties with greater profit and less hassles.

Who: Taught by Attorney Tristan Pettit, who drafts many of the landlord tenant forms for Wisconsin Legal Blank.

Attorney Tristan Pettit has given similar landlord-tenant law seminars to fellow attorneys, landlords, and property manager organizations that charge their members $400-$500.
This is your opportunity to learn all of the same information at a huge discount through the Apartment Association .

When: February 24th, 2018 Registration opens at 7:10 AM. The seminar is 8:30 to 5 with a half hour lunch break. There will be a one hour question and answer session afterwards, ending promptly at 6 PM. Many will find the Q&A invaluable, therefore you may wish to make arrangements to stay until 6 PM.

Where: Clarion Hotel 5311 S. Howell Avenue, Milwaukee [Map]

Included: 100 plus page manual to help you put what you learn into practice.

Price:

• Members $179
• Non-Members $297

Specials: Not a member? Pay just $1 more than the non member price and receive both the Boot Camp and a 12 month AASEW General Membership including member discounts at Home Depot, Sherwin Williams and more.($298).

Wisconsin landlord-tenant laws are constantly changing. To help keep you up to date those who attended in the past three years receive a $40 discount.

What you will learn at the Apartment Association's Spring 2018 Landlord Boot Camp

Landlord Boot Camp covers everything that you need to know about residential Landlord Tenant law in Wisconsin, as amended in March 2012 by Act 143, in March 2014 and again in March 2016 with the passage of ACT 176, including:

1. How to properly screen prospective tenants
2. How to draft written screening criteria to assist you in the selection process
3. How to comply with both federal and state Fair Housing laws including how to comply with “reasonable modifications" and “reasonable accommodations" requests
4. How to legally reject an applicant
5. What rental documents you should be using and why
6. When you should be using a 5-day notice versus a 14-day notice, 28-day notice, or 30-day notice and how to properly serve the notice on your tenant The Wisconsin Eviction Notices have changed and improved under Act 176, enacted in March 2016
7. Everything you wanted to know (and probably even more than you wanted to know) about the Residential Rental Practices (ATCP 134) and how to avoid having to pay double damages to your tenant for breaching ATCP 134
8. When you are legally allowed to enter your tenant's apartment
9. How to properly draft an eviction summons and complaint
10. What to do to keep the commissioner from dismissing your eviction suit
11. What you can legally deduct from a security deposit
12. How to properly draft a security deposit transmittal / 21-day letter
13. How to handle pet damage
14. What to do with a tenant's abandoned property and how this may affect whether or not you file an eviction suit
15. How to pursue your ex-tenant for damages to your rental property and past due rent (and whether it is even worth it to do so)
16. An ample question and answer period. This alone is worth the admission.
    
    . . . and much more.

You get all this for less than you would pay for an hour of an attorney's time.

Last year's AASEW Landlord Boot Camp was filled to capacity. So much so we even had to turn a few people away. So call early to reserve your spot.

Call the Association at (414) 276-7378 or email us at membership@AASEW.org today to reserve your spot.

Remember that “landlording" is a business — so take the time to educate yourself on how to better manage your business and avoid costly errors!

Good News For Rental Property Investors - Rental Weatherization Program Is Eliminated

I apologize for the delay in getting this post published but there is good news for rental property investors -- the much maligned rental weatherization program was eliminated as part of the passing of the state budget (2017 Wisconsin Act 59) which was signed into law on September 21, 2017 and the program will sunset as of January 1, 2018.

Back in 1979 the legislature passed a law requiring that all rental properties be weatherized prior to the property being sold. The Department of Safety and Professional Services developed minimum energy efficiency standards which focused on windows, patio doors, inward-swinging exterior doors, weatherstripping, caulking, moisture control and insulation. The program went into effect in 1985 with the goal that all rental properties being transferred would meet a minimum of energy conservation standards. So prior to a rental property being sold, the seller had to have an inspection, make any necessary repairs as advised by the inspector, and obtain a certificate of compliance with the program.

To avoid this obstacle, in practice, the buyer of the property typically entered into a stipulation agreeing to meet the requirements within 1 year of purchase. The new owner frequently did not have an inspection or make any improvements within the one year period. However, there was very little enforcement of the program and as a result an open stipulation for compliance would remain open indefinitely or until there was another sale of the rental property.

Under the latter scenario, the program requirements became an impediment when the initial purchaser wanted to sell the rental property to another because the open stipulation would be discovered at the last minute and real estate agents, attorneys, title companies etc. ended up running around to figure out what needed to be done to satisfy the stipulation so as not to impede the sale.

So while the program had high hopes and goals, it was not implemented very well and caused delay and confusion. The program will now end as of the first of the year.

Wisconsin's Land Contract Default Remedies

This is a guest post by Atty. David Espin of Petrie + Pettit

As bank's lending standards have tightened in recent years, financing for real estate sales has become more difficult to obtain. More buyers and sellers are considering alternative financing options, such as land contracts. If the buyer, otherwise known as the vendee, makes all payments on time and pays off the land contract when due, then all parties seemingly walk away from the transaction happy.

However, in the event the buyer defaults on the land contract, Wisconsin has a limited number of remedies that the seller, otherwise known as the vendor, may choose to employ.

Strict Foreclosure. Vendors most frequently elect to use this option. Like in a traditional foreclosure, the vendor starts by filing a strict foreclosure lawsuit against the vendee. Unless the vendee files an answer and disputes the assertions in the complaint, the court typically will grant a default judgment and give the vendee a period of time to pay off the remaining amount due under the land contract, called the “redemption period." In Wisconsin, the redemption period must be at least seven business days. If the vendee pays off the balance due during the redemption period, it obtains legal title to the property. If it fails to pay, title reverts back to the vendor. If the vendor chooses this option, it cannot also pursue the vendee for a money judgment for any additional amounts owed.

Specific Performance. This option typically is used if the property is significantly underwater, and the vendee has assets available to satisfy a money judgment. It is most akin to a traditional bank foreclosure; a lawsuit is filed for the balance due, a redemption period is set, and a sheriff's sale is scheduled. The vendor can “credit bid" at the sheriff's sale up to the full amount of the debt it is owed and pursue the vendee for any remaining balance, which is called a “deficiency judgment."

Lawsuit for Breach of Contract. The vendor can also simply sue the vendee for the unpaid balance due under the land contract. In this scenario, the vendee retains title to the property, and the vendor obtains a judgment against the vendee for the full balance due. The vendor would then have to satisfy the money judgment from the vendee's assets.

Quiet Title Action. If the vendee's interest in the property is “insignificant," the vendor can declare the land contract to be at an end and bring an action to quiet title, thus restoring full title to the vendor. While no hard and fast rule delineates when the vendee's interest is “insignificant," this remedy likely only could be utilized if the vendee has made a small number of payments prior to the default.

Ejectment. Similar to having a tenant evicted, the vendor can sue to have the vendee “ejected" from possession of the property. The vendor can then manage the property on its own, or request that a court appoint a third-party like a receiver to manage the property on its behalf.

While selling a property through a land contract may seem like a viable solution when a buyer is not able to obtain a traditional bank loan, sellers should carefully consider the additional time, expense, and hassle involved with Wisconsin's default remedies before deciding whether or not it is their best option.

Attorney David Espin