Attempt to Add Source of Income and Veteran Status As New Federal Protected Classes

Two U.S. Senators recently introduced a new federal bill that is being referred to as the "Fair Housing Improvement Act" (FHIA).  The FHIA introduces two additional protected classes to the seven protected classes under the Fair Housing Act of 1968.  

The first proposal would make veterans of wars a new federal protected class.

The second, would make "source of income" a new federal protected class.  If "source of income" becomes a federal protected class then landlords would be unable to deny a rental applicant solely because they receive a Section 8 Rent Assistance Voucher.  "Source of income" would also include HUD-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) vouchers, benefits received through Social Security, income received by a court order, payment from a trust or guardian, or any other lawful source of income.

Currently many states and municipalities already have "source of income" protection laws.  Milwaukee County added the class of "receipt of rental or housing assistance" as a protected class in 2018.  The argument being made is that the states and municipalities enforcement or "source of income" discrimination varies widely, and as such "source of income" must become a federal protected class.

GUEST POST: Wisconsin Rental Income Standards and Section 8 Rent Vouchers

Guest post from Tim Ballering  - justalandlord.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From a Fair Housing perspective, you probably must account in some manner for the value of the Section 8 payment when calculating an income multiplier guideline.

I’ve read of the argument made in other jurisdictions that if an owner is using a rent multiplier, that it should be on net rent to the tenant. This is probably not a workable answer for either tenant nor the owner. If the net payment by the tenant is $20 with a three times multiplier, a $60 per month income is not going to cover living expenses like heat and lights. A good discussion of this issue from a while ago is at: Bigger Pockets

In WI you must include the value of child support, food stamps and perhaps* Rent Assistance Vouchers in income calculations. So if the gross rent is $800 and the tenant receives $700 RA, $500 in food stamps, they would need to earn $1200 additional to meet the three times multiplier.

*Wisconsin Lawful Source of Income definition:

Wis Admin Code DWD 220.02(8)  “Lawful source of income” includes, but is not limited to, lawful compensation or lawful remuneration in exchange for goods or services provided; profit from financial investments; any negotiable draft, coupon or voucher representing monetary value such as food stamps; social security; public assistance; unemployment compensation or worker’s compensation payments.

There is a 1995 federal case, Knapp v. Eagle Property Management Corp, that found the value of Section 8 vouchers are not required to be included as income.

But that was nearly 25 years ago. Sentiments have changed over that time. I believe that if Knapp was tried today the court would find against the owner on this question as concepts like disparate impact were not widely argued then. Today we are restricted by HUD in using criminal records in screening because of the disparate impact on members of protected classes.

The plain language reading of the WI code makes not including the voucher value in the rent multiplier calculation open to expensive litigation, which the Knapp court determined that their insurer had no duty to defend.

To form your own opinion on this and other WI fair housing standards, a good starting point is:

“STATE OF WISCONSIN Fair Housing Plan Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing and Actions to Overcome Them Update to the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan”

~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks Tim

Milwaukee County Passes Ordinance Making "Receipt of Rental or Housing Assistance" A Protected Class

On June 21, 2018 the Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors passed a county ordinance amending Chapter 107 of the County Code of Ordinances (which deals with Fair Housing) adding "receipt of rental or housing assistance" as a protected class.  The ordinance went into effect as of July 19, 2018.  The Milwaukee County's Office of Corporation Counsel shall be responsible for enforcement. 

The revised ordinance defines "receipt of rental or housing assistance" as follows:

"Receipt of rental housing assistance" means the receipt of any form of financial contribution from a third party for the purposes of creating or keeping affordable housing for tenants, purchasers, or other potential housing recipients, including but not limited to, assistance provided pursuant to Title 42, United Housing Code, section 1437f (commonly known as the "Section 8" housing program), the HOME Partnership Program, the Community Development Block Grant program, or any other public rental assistance vouchers or programs.  It shall not be considered unlawful discrimination in housing for a housing provider to (1) refuse to accept emergency assistance funds under s. 49.138, Wis. Stats., or (2) refuse to accept any other public rental assistance or voucher if such rental assistance or voucher does not fully reimburse the housing provider for the amount of rent due at the time a rental assistance or voucher payment is made. 

What this means to landlords and property managers operating in Milwaukee County is that you can no longer advertise that you do not accept "Rent Assistance" or "Section 8" tenants.  It also means that when prospective tenants call you and ask if you accept "Section 8" that you cannot say "no."

What this does not mean however is that you are required to accept any and all tenants receiving rental or housing assistance.  You can still utilize your written screening criteria and if the applicant does not meet your requirements, they can still be denied even though they receive housing assistance.  But your screening criteria can no longer have the receipt of housing assistance as a basis for denial.

This also does not mean that you are now required to enter into a contract with a municipality or its agent, often referred to as a Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract, if you do not agree with the terms and conditions of that contract.  A landlord or property management company cannot be forced to enter into a contract that the landlord does not want to be a part of.  Many landlords who are otherwise in support of this ordinance and its intent are not in favor of the terms and requirements of the HAP contract.  Landlords that disagree with the terms of the HAP contract can still refuse to sign it.  In my prior blog post on this issue, I list several of the issues/concerns that some have with the HAP contract. Being part of some of the discussions with the County on the concerns with the HAP contract, I am aware that the County is aware of our concerns with the contract and its representatives have indicated that plan to look into some of these issues.

We will have to wait and see how this all plays out.  I will be discussing this issue more in depth, along with many other important landord-tenant law topics, at my next Landlord Boot Camp on October 20, 2018.

You can read the ordinance here.

Happy Landlording.