Landlords Can Be Liable for the Discriminatory Acts of Their Tenants

Perhaps one of the most important landlord-tenant cases published in 2018 was Wetzel v. Glen St. Andrew Living Community, LLC, 2018 WI 4057365 (7th Cir. Aug. 27, 2018).  In Wetzel, the Seventh Circuit (which includes Wisconsin) held that a landlord may be liable under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) for failing to protect a tenant from known discriminatory harassment by other tenants.

Within months of arriving at Glen St. Andrew, Wetzel, who was a lesbian, was physically and verbally abused by other tenants. On multiple occasions, Wetzel asked staff members to intervene and protect her.  Instead, staff appeared to punish Wetzel by restricting where she could go within the facility.

Glen St. Andrews own Rules and Regulations document allowed it to evict any tenant who “engages in acts or omissions that constitute a direct threat to the health and safety of other individuals.”  Rather than enforce its rules against the tenants harassing Wetzel, staff told her not to worry about the harassment, dismissed the abuse as accidental, denied Wetzel’s version of the facts, and even called her a liar.

The Court wrote that if the landlord had done nothing but listen to the tenant, its holding might have been more limited; however, in this case, Glen St. Andrew took affirmative steps to retaliate against Wetzel for complaining.

The Wetzel court interpreted the FHA broadly and ruled that not only does the FHA create liability for a landlord who intentionally discriminates against a tenant based on their protected class status; the FHA also creates liability against a landlord that has actual notice of tenant-on-tenant harassment based on the tenant's membership in a protected class, yet chooses not to take any reasonable steps within its control to stop the harassment.

While the landlord's actions in Wetzel were pretty egregious and faced with a different set of facts, the Court may have held differently; the key takeaway from this case is that if landlords fail to curtail discriminatory conduct by tenants against other tenants, when it is possible for the landlord to do so, the landlord may end up having direct liability under the FHA.

Atty. Tristan R. Pettit

Tristan is the President of Pettit Law Group S.C. and focuses his practice in the area of Landlord-Tenant law representing landlords and property management companies throughout Wisconsin.

Previous
Previous

Part 2: Landlords Can Be Liable for the Discriminatory Acts of Their Tenants

Next
Next

The Next Landlord Boot Camp Will Be Held on Feb. 9, 2019